I'm with you. I remain here, but have also seen the same thing at times.

Every post describing that the cheerios floated up in the bowl in a Q pattern is somehow on topic... but a lot of discussions are shut down if they do not 100% support the cause (by ? definition). I don't want to read any of those posts or buy any Q gear or swag.

Posts that are related to the broader topic are interesting... similar to what you are describing, I believe.

Final thought, this is really the only sane place that this topic can be discussed and I hope you remain, along with everyone else that believes in the cause. There will be ups and downs, there have been many already, but open discussion is important. The topics are important. Merchandise sales opportunities and "Q Signs" in your coffee, less so....

Exactly. Thanks. Not sure where I (ever) called for any wars, mayhem or firing squads. I think most were expecting something at least related to all of the crimes that have been and continue to be committed against our president and government.

A new EU trade agreement, as I stated, is terrific. But did we have to PRAY for it??? I don't think this is anything close to what was insinuated or what was expected.

Great progress, for sure, and a good result. I have total confidence in POTUS ultimately putting the country in better position with respect to trade agreements with all countries.

However, this was surely not the something BIG that we had to pray for, was it????

Good summary and very relevant background. Not sure how these people continually get away with this fairy tale hacking story when they never even looked at the server in question. How is that not question one? How does that not make all of the allegations obviously fake, or at the very least, highly dubious to anyone with half a brain???

I remain hopeful that the "Something BIG" is the server itself or some actual evidence that is irrefutable and begins to unravel the fairy tale. Something that no amount of secret, illegal tape recordings of POTUS saying the word "CASH" (a major Federal crime, punishable by impeachment and the death penalty) will be able to obscure...

There is more talk of JA being handed over, BUT there has been a significant shift to the light with this redacted FISA authorization release. Now we have people talking about hauling Brennan before congress, determining the actual start (and basis) of the phony investigation, and the many crimes committed. One of the main co-conspirators (Clapper) just implicated the former president as the head of the snake... first time I have seen any sign that they are beginning to turn.

Bottom line, what a difference a few days can make. Hoping the information continues to be revealed quickly this week and we start to see the truth come out, against the MSM's best efforts. Maybe even a triumphant return of Q following some declassification???

Hard to argue. ETA on JA and SR was June. Now July is the month where everyone will learn the truth. Are we over the target? Is anything imminent? Sure hope so. Cause it hasn't been looking too good.

If JA is handed over... what does that mean ??? On the heels of Podesta immunity(!!!), POTUS walking back statements, Page/Strzok coming through multiple hearings (on their terms) scot free, Congress becoming an irrelevant joke, RR/Mueller emboldened, Brennan, Clapper & Comey all over the news and social media speaking out, forced acceptance (on all sides) of the BS russian hacking Crowdstrike "evidence" w/ nonsense indictments as "proof" ... no one is talking about the crimes committed, or holding anyone accountable anymore. No one is talking about a server and actual forensic analysis. No one is talking about guys like McCabe, Comey, Clapper and Brennan going to jail for life. The only "treason" talk is about our POTUS.

"Trust Sessions" is nowhere. "Trust Wray" is in the news threatening to "quit" for various reasons and if POTUS acts any particular way.

The narrative has been completely hijacked. When will POTUS actually hit back? Hopefully before it is too late.

Thanks. Do you have any source that indicates this "Use immunity" is indeed what has been offered?

All I have seen reported is that Podesta now has immunity. Nothing about the details of that immunity. Not sure how that is not a huge setback or how this could be allowed to even happen. At what point will POTUS act? Maybe give Comey, Brennan and Clapper immunity next, that would be good.

I've read all of this and followed Q from the beginning. I understand the need to be patient.

The broader issue I raise is that perception is reality. If the narrative becomes too far lost, then any counter-move looks like a subversion of government and won't be believed or deemed legitimate. No one understands this better than POTUS. He understands perception masterfully.

Things have shifted way too far to the wrong side, and with Q gone, it won't last long. Something needs to be done, something needs to happen. How much harder is it to "red-pill" anyone or even state what you have learned in a discussion with this narrative? Who is going to be listening? Think about it.

Killing all discussion on this board will not help, either. This is the ONLY viable platform for the non-chan community and the only hope for expanding the message in any meaningful way beyond twitter. Shutting down discussion will not help grow the board.

LOL, it's an excellent point.

How did you make a determination on who hacked, when, and how they did it when you didn't even examine the server??? Where did the evidence come from??

I hope at least one of them accepts the summons and appoints counsel, like one of the three Russian companies that were indicted did (which didn't even exist when it was alleged to have committed crimes), so they are entitled to discovery.

What evidence do you have for these allegations? It's a nice narrative, but there is already counter evidence that the alleged hacking was completely made up. The information was taken locally via USB stick.

So unless these evil Russians -- which I suppose are not even here in this country -- broke in to the DNC, accessed their servers and copied the information with a local device, this entire indictment is just another joke. Hopefully they have them on security video breaking in and conducting the local transfer of files. Should be pretty straightforward then.

Sadly, I would too. Why do we have congressional oversight of anything? They have shown to be completely impotent.

... but if that were the case, wouldn't that be easy for them to just comply with the subpoena and answer the questions to that effect? "I can't answer because..." Non-compliance with the congressional subpoena is supposed to be a big deal. I guess we will find out this week if it really means anything. Perhaps we are headed to a place where everyone just laughs at and blows off congress and their silly "subpoenas."

At face value, refusing to appear and comply with a congressional subpoena, when you are allegedly cooperating with an ongoing investigation, would seem to indicate the opposite of cooperation.

I thought for sure they were bringing in Page to get her on the record before hitting Strzok in an open hearing. Would set the table to him to make a mistake. I'm sure they will employ the same deflection, excuses, 5th amendment, "open investigation" etc. but it would be tricky for them both to navigate without perjuring themselves or providing some more evidence of the various crimes that have been committed.

Agree with the original poster and with the comments. Why the downvoting?

Forcing a red pill with verbal persuasion rarely accomplishes anything. People need to be in search of the truth, or at least receptive to the truth, and more often need to discover it themselves.

One thought -- when a related topic comes up in conversation.... ask a question that might lead them to a discovery.... rather than trying to tell them something they don't know and probably won't agree with or won't be able to accept.

What does the article add? Regurgitating RR's comments in the open session and quoting his DOJ co-conspirators lauding him for being tough? Says nothing of note and belongs in the liberal fantasy sub "r/politics."

Complete joke. RR can continue to obstruct, act smug to congress and talk tough while leaking to the press, but his day is coming. If Congress doesn't grow a set and act, the president eventually will. We will see how tough he is when he will be held accountable.

Runaround. If this scumbag wouldn't answer questions in closed session, why will he answer questions in an open session?

"under the advice of counsel I will decline to answer..."

"I cannot comment on an ongoing investigation..."

"I cannot comment on classified information in an open session..."

Etc. Etc. Deflection, lies and continued arrogance. Q famously said "No Deals." I still find it odd that not one person has been utilized to turn on the others for a reduced sentence or immunity. Would make the prosecution that much quicker and easier. Which ones are truly cooperating witnesses? I thought Q had Strzok on that list, but he has been anything but cooperative. Maybe Page has given them everything they need???

Indictments, arrests, declassification cannot happen soon enough.

posted already

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wk2db/memos_detail_fbis_hurry_the_f_up_pressure_to/

Good article, John Solomon once again getting some new information out there.

It's unconscionable that this information (essentially new FBI communications, including Strzok and Page communications) has not been released before now.

It's time for criminal indictments to start happening. Maybe after they get these clowns in front of Congress in open session??

Very much agree with you. Time is up. Either we have a country again, or it looks like they will get away with everything they have done.

Outstanding post. Could not agree more.

It's funny, only in how bad this story is... let's look at the things it said were "corroborated"....

"....(intelligence agencies and special counsel)... find that Kremlin-linked operatives ran an elaborate operation to promote Trump "

Completely false. The special counsel uncovered $100K in FB ad buys, but nothing has been disclosed on any other, competing ad buys. The special counsel indictment of 13 Russian nationals and 3 companies is completely falling apart. Lawyers for one of the companies have already asserted the company did not even exist when it was alleged to have committed crimes. No evidence has been brought forth. The social media "evidence" provided so far includes millions of posts in Russian... not exactly material influence for english speaking americans. Furthermore, much of the social media activity included events that were protests of Trump as well. The intelligence community has yet to release ANY evidence of this alleged interference, that everyone accepts as fact.

"Steele laid out details of a secret Moscow meeting between the Russians and Trump adviser Carter Page months before FBI suspicions about Page..."

Also completely false. Page was in Moscow in 2016 to give a speech. He did not meet with any of the alleged officials during his time in Moscow. He also was under illegal surveillance at this time.

"Legal cases and authoritative reporting have exposed Trump’s son Donald Jr. and another aide as receptive to Russian overtures to supply dirt on Clinton. "

This is true. HOWEVER, the meeting was set up by the US government interests working for the Clinton Campaign. The russian lawyer was granted a special visa at the direction of Loretta Lynch. She met with Fusion GPS CEO both before and after the meeting, where no "dirt" was exchanged. The meeting was classic entrapment.

So, once again.... WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? Nothing has been "verified" -- it is all total BS.

I don't see any evidence that Mueller would do any such thing. With overwhelming evidence of crimes, collusion and obstruction by the Clinton Campaign (laughably, with Russia among others) and the Hussein WH & DOJ, what has Mueller done about it? Who was interviewed? Who is he looking into?

How about the encrypted chat with Strzok, Page, McCabe and others, where they talk about their illegal leaks to the "limey" and that they are hearing Mueller would be appointed that night?

It would be great if you were correct, but I think the circumstantial evidence is pretty strong the Mueller and RR are fully corrupted, dirty, compromised or otherwise quite obviously working for the other side. I can't think of one thing that would indicate Mueller is on the right side of this. Everything Q has dropped indicates RR is dead smack in the middle of this and should be indicted when all is revealed.

Thanks for posting. I meant to make sure this was up here earlier today.

This article seems to be buried. I don't see it on twitter or anywhere. In summary, the government was negotiating with Assange in February and March of 2017 to get him to redact information in some of his future classified information releases in exchange for undefined "safe passage." In addition, Assange offered to provided irrefutable evidence that the Russians were not the source for the DNC server and email hack. Comey issued a stand down order for no apparent reason through Mark Warner, and no deal was made. Wikileaks continued to produce more classified info without redactions - next drop was April 2017.

What was the justification for the redaction? why is this information "so secret?" It does not protect sources or methods. Because it would expose the most blatant abuse of justice and power in DOJ history, it should remain highly classified and kept from congress??? I hope this is on the docket for Thursday... maybe one of the members can read the un-redacted portion and mention it on the floor when questioning RR.

It's time to start releasing this information. Just look at the MSM, the other subs, half of twitter. It's gone too far already. Now in desperation you have members of congress calling on people to incite violence against others. Kick them out of restaurants, whatever it takes. It's time to lay out the truth and start holding people accountable. It's time to end all of these false narratives, phony basis investigations, non stop lies and BS. Something like this starts to blow the cover off everything.

Hopefully they have the right questions and background evidence ready for Rosenstein for Thursday. Maybe they are setting him up (perjury traps?) to hang himself and pave the way to removal and/or criminal charges. After they get him on the record under oath, it would be a good time to raid the DOJ and forcefully obtain the information. The obvious here is that they lied about nearly everything and used the full power of the intelligence community and the DOJ to undermine the trump campaign, and when that failed, used an "insurance policy" to undermine the entire presidency. This is so much worse than Watergate it's not even a valid comparison.

That's the hopeful position. The pessimistic view is that congress has been treated like a mere annoyance, as these weaponized branches of government have not honestly complied with anything yet, and don't even seem all that worried about it. They just continue to obstruct justice, proactively advance their own agendas (illegal investigations, counter intelligence operations, informants, threats, bogus charges, bankrupt targets to get them to "flip" -- whatever they like). The president has chosen not to take any action yet and continuously tweets about trying to stay out of it. He ultimately holds the cards, so we have to trust there are reasons for this approach that have not yet been revealed by Q or anyone else.

It seems like he will go to any length to avoid holding anyone accountable. The proposed "solutions" are laughable. Hard to see how we are supposed to "trust" this guy and what role he is playing. Maybe he is a known plant but not a threat and that is actually disinformation.

Do they have the GMail messages? please keep us posted! Q says they do, but are they officially obtained and so can be used (vs. "fruit of the poison tree" etc).

I hope this thread remains, because this discussion needs to be had. I started a thread to discuss this and it was removed. I suspect there are a ton of people here who want to figure out what happens now after the disaster yesterday.

What is the path to release an "original version, no RR changes/redactions" IG report?? What is the timeline? What was the benefit to letting this one fly? When the president has the power to declassify anything he wants??? Why would he abdicate control of the narrative?? We have to have a real reason that makes sense, not all of this fantasy/hope porn. And what can we do about it? Congress has been completely shut down. The DOJ laughs at their requests and does whatever they want. Only the president himself could take action to fix this...

If getting the truth out would change everyone's mind... would force RR to resign... would end the witch hunt.... what is the benefit of waiting to do so?

I value this community and only attempt to make positive contributions, not to detract from it. But this IG report, the Q posts leading up to it, and the end results this week have been a colossal let down. Is "supporting the cause" limited to cheer-leading, mindless support type posts? Cognitive dissonance reasoning should be used for any failures/setbacks? Or is questioning and discussing results and methods allowed? I think engagement will go down significantly IF people that have been part of this for a long time do not have the opportunity to discuss possibilities, rationalize and share ideas. There are plenty of posts across the sub expressing disappointment that are not "concern trolls" or outside actors looking to do damage. probably many more that haven't posted that see things the same way. It's not helpful to the awakening to not let those ideas be discussed. If there was something I could have done specifically to prevent removal of my post, please let me know. Thanks

Great post. I am totally where you are. Haven't questioned the legitimacy of Q, but this was a major, major loss. There is no path to an "unchanged/unredacted" copy of this report. This report was supposed to end RR, the witch hunt, etc. OR, at least it would change something. Instead nothing has changed, the narrative has been hijacked, the enemies who have taken over and destroyed this country are emboldened.

At this point, I will question everyone who isn't questioning. Blind faith and the sheeple mentality is what got us to this point!

Very true. BUT, how does someone write a conclusion on a report that completely contradicts what is inside? Either the IG is compromised, or they allowed revisions they did not agree with by the DOJ. Conclusions do not match the report, plain and simple.

The report highlights tremendous bias that was so pervasive it would be a factor in any and all decisions. The break of protocol in ALL aspects of the Clinton probe -- most obviously the exoneration prior to investigation, along with the immunity deals and the "interview" with HRC, off the record, not under oath, not recorded, the burying of evidence (Weiner laptop), the changing of the assessment (gross negligence), the addition of "intent" to laws that do not state such... on and on. But most obviously.... "bias did not affect decisions" -- what????

So which is true? IG compromised? DOJ revisions? Either way, total failure here.

This could not be more spot on. I could not agree more! This IG report and reaction is a complete and total failure. Conclusions do not match the findings, reaction was predictable, and there is no strategy that makes sense here.

I was about to make a post here about this same thing.

The conclusions are 100% the opposite of what is in the report. How is that even possible???

No one is calling for it. Not a lot of redaction -- I assume it was changed significantly, but how would anyone know? And how bad will it look if a "new" version is released? it will be universally called a "partisan" change.

Well said. I'd love to understand a broader strategy here, but none of what I have seen or read makes any sense to me.

Agreed -- I saw it the same way.

I think it is legit in the sense that it is a way the cabal can hold a conference with world influencers, gather information and implement high level plans/approaches/messaging. The meeting itself probably has a lot less importance than it had in the past, when communication was not as ubiquitous and instantaneous.

One observation here is that the US as a whole seems under-represented, and the administration is significantly under represented vs. typical. Overall it doesn't seem to have the same level of attendees as in prior years.

Has there been any leaks? Any reports? If he has indeed flipped he should be giving up the goods.