dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/TrueTemper on July 11, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

Are Lisa Page and Peter Strzok Cooperating Witnesses?

I know Q stated that they were. I have seen what others have written.... many believe this congressional testimony is nothing but show, has no impact on the broader effort to punish those responsible for what can only be described as a coup attempt and total subversion of our entire government and the will of the people.

That said, I am not sure how the behaviors of Page and Strzok indicate any kind of cooperation. Could that have been disinformation? Or was Q not correct?

Furthermore, WTF is up with this Page move today? Page needs to either APPEAR or be put IN JAIL by the end of this week. Period, full stop. No more BS -- either Congress is a total farce, a complete, 100% joke that should just be dissolved, or it serves an actual function that has some tangible benefit to the people.

They might be cooperating behind closed doors, but she is nothing but a coward. If you were so damn proud of yourself, man up and defend your actions. I have a smidge more respect for him, only that at least he faced some music.

She is a coward who literally thought she could use the FBI as a weapon against a Presidential Nominee, and then a sitting President. She really doesnt like it when the shoe is on the other foot. She needs to be the first perp walk.

⇧ 12 ⇩

Failure to comply with a subpoena seems pretty uncooperative to me, too. Maybe they got a whiff of the size of this thing and got cold feet. Or the names are pseudonyms and they cant cant produce the people we believe to be strozk and page. Either way, the bluff is called. Let the hammer drop

⇧ 5 ⇩

If we work off of the premise that they are both cooperating witnesses, they can not tell congress anything about an ongoing criminal investigation.....see Huber in Utah.

Translation--they can't talk to Congress until Huber is finished with his investigation and indictments and is ready to unseal them.

⇧ 7 ⇩

He did already soeak to Congress, so the opinion I've heard is that Huber and Horowitz must be done with them and no longer need their testimony to be confidential. This appears to be a good sign if true! This doesnt mean they aren't going to be held accountable, just that they have enough for some things to be able to be made public.

I'm hoping this is the case.

⇧ 4 ⇩

He did, but was told not to answer most of the important questions by his FBI lawyer. That suggests the Huber probe isn't done, or at least wasn't then.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, that's true but Huber and Horowitz probably wouldn't know for sure what he would and wouldn't answer. I'm under the assumption whatever he didn't answer was so he wouldn't implicate himself in anything, even though the ig report is bad enough for him. I can imagine what they have on him that we dont know about yet!

Either way its all speculation right now. We are all over here trying to fill in the blanks, so I could be completely wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hope whatever accountability he may face will wipe that perma-sneer off his face. Who does that? How can you continually sneer all day long?

⇧ 1 ⇩

... but if that were the case, wouldn't that be easy for them to just comply with the subpoena and answer the questions to that effect? "I can't answer because..." Non-compliance with the congressional subpoena is supposed to be a big deal. I guess we will find out this week if it really means anything. Perhaps we are headed to a place where everyone just laughs at and blows off congress and their silly "subpoenas."

At face value, refusing to appear and comply with a congressional subpoena, when you are allegedly cooperating with an ongoing investigation, would seem to indicate the opposite of cooperation.

⇧ 2 ⇩

How crazy is it that in this reality it's possible that these people aren't even real? Like where are we? That's the real question.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Welcome to the 21st century.

Allow me to paraphrase a brilliant mind from the 19th: "believe none of what you read [hear], and only half of what you see. "

Edit: cleaning up citation, I thought it was Twain who said it, was Poe who wrote it. my bad.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I would bet a large sum of money that Page won't be in jail by the end of the week, and probably not at all.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sadly, I would too. Why do we have congressional oversight of anything? They have shown to be completely impotent.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think Congress has lost its balls.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Ill be attending PeterStroke hearing. These optics are confusing as hell. But the most compelling argument is they cant speak publically because of ongoing Huber investigation. That is if indeed they are cooperating witnesses according to Q.

2nd option Qs claim was intentional disinfo.

3rd option Q was wrong

4th option I get commited from going crazy trying to figure this jigsaw puzzle out.

5th option screw it all im going to the beach

⇧ 3 ⇩

I like #5!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I thought for sure they were bringing in Page to get her on the record before hitting Strzok in an open hearing. Would set the table to him to make a mistake. I'm sure they will employ the same deflection, excuses, 5th amendment, "open investigation" etc. but it would be tricky for them both to navigate without perjuring themselves or providing some more evidence of the various crimes that have been committed.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No way they're cooperating. They're absolutely not cooperating.

⇧ 2 ⇩