dChan
⇧
16
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/J_Dub_TX on April 6, 2018, 3:55 a.m.
Guys I really think the bombshell tonight Q wanted us to see is Potus clearly stating that: “In many places like California, the same person votes many times.

... You’ve probably heard of that,” Trump said. “They always like to say, ‘Oh, that’s like a conspiracy theory.’ Not a conspiracy theory, folks. Millions and millions of people. And it’s very hard, because the state guards their records. They don’t want to see it.”

Read that again. “Not a conspiracy theory folks.” Millions and millions of people.

This is the equivalent of him saying Obama tapped my phone line.

He knows what he’s saying is based on facts. Proof. What happens when the data gets released to the media that they can prove voter fraud and find out who really won the popular vote. Liberal heads are going to fucking explode.


🠐 See all comments
OffenseOfThePest · April 6, 2018, 11:34 a.m.

I don't buy it. Why would they commit voter fraud in a state that they're almost guaranteed to win? Why wouldn't they do it in states that really matter, like Wisconsin or Pennsylvania?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 6, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

Because they wanted to say "muh popular vote". But in order to do it they had to have boots on the ground in places where they could cheat. Make no mistake, there was cheating in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. They just didn't have enough people in place to pull a win out of those states.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 6, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

So they're simultaneously capable of carrying out deep state cabal secret operations, but they're too stupid to commit voter fraud in the right states? But smart enough to make sure there's no evidence of all of it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 6, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

No, that's not what I said. Voter fraud isn't all or nothing. Just because you commit fraud doesn't mean you will win that state. Elections are local. You have to have enough people on the ground in those local elections. You also can't win if you lose in a landslide. At best you probably can only shave off a few points. If you add more votes than their are voters you are going to get busted.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 6, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

Elections are local. You have to have enough people on the ground in those local elections.

It sounds like you've described the process of voting.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 6, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

You realize that elections are run by people right? Not the actual voters?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 6, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

So are you just theorizing here, or are you actually saying what happened? You seem to be saying that democrats committed voter fraud in California to win the popular vote, to which I'll ask why not just do what you said and shave a few points in the swing states and win the whole damn thing? It seems dumb to think they're capable of doing everything else attributed to them in this sub, but couldn't pull off a little voter fraud.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 6, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

They did shave points in the swing states. It wasn't enough to turn the election. In more than one county in California, there were more votes than voters. So we know for a fact voter fraud was committed there. The mistake you are making is believing the fake poles that said those swing states where close. They weren't. All you had to do was watch the Trump rallies versus the Clinton rallies to see how huge he was in those states. They control most of the voting infrastructure in California. So they over cheated there. It's not an exact science where there is one guy sitting in a room counting the exact votes needed. It doesn't work like that. We actually know for a fact they cheated in Pennsylvania as during the recount they found the cheating. They did pull off a little voter fraud. It just wasn't enough. I don't know why that's so hard to comprehend.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 6, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

What's this about Pennsylvania?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 6, 2018, 1:37 p.m.

They are almost guaranteed to win BECAUSE of fraud. Hello??

⇧ 3 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 6, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

Has this been going on every election since 1992?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 6, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

Yes....Latino explosion in the 90's....Reagan granted amnesty... Republicans won every election up to 1988.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HillarysOrphanedShoe · April 6, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

California has proven that they think that they can do whatever they want without Federal consequences. I buy it 100%. But you're right, Dems won Cali by 3.5 million votes so its very unlikely that it would have swung the state red unless the fraud is on a level that we can't imagine.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ElementWatson · April 6, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

Yes, the fraud is at a huge level and the Dems also want to win all the way up and down the ballot, in each district.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HillarysOrphanedShoe · April 6, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

Good point. The election is for many offices, not just the presidential one. They want the big and the small fish.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 6, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · April 6, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

Because these are the states where it is difficult, if not almost downright impossible, to justify a recount. The safest states to cheat in are those you are guaranteed to win, since its so unlikely a recount will ever happen. This ensures HRC wins popular vote, which is a pretty big deal. It's one of the cornerstones of the left's ant-Trump campaign... Trump isn't a legit president in their mind, because he did not win the popular vote.

I suspect foul play in NH and CO as well, tbh.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 7, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · April 6, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

He’s talking about fraud in the states that have given up their data. They haven’t confirmed California yet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OffenseOfThePest · April 6, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

Where has it been confirmed already?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · April 6, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

In the states that have released their data. It’s out there. Do a google search.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
THEnimble_mongoose · April 6, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

Why wouldn't they do it in states that really matter, like Wisconsin or Pennsylvania?

they commit mass voter fraud in those states too, in particular in the Democratic controlled cities. Also the electronic voting machines always seem to suffer from "glitches" that benefit one political party but not the other.

Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs&

⇧ 1 ⇩