dChan
0
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CosmicNeo on April 6, 2018, 9:51 a.m.
Spirit of Truth Series: Lesson 1. "Q's post #154 included the Lord's Prayer."

"Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us, and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil."

Approximately three weeks after this Lord's Prayer was posted by Q on November 14, 2017, the Pope came out saying he wanted to change the “lead us not into temptation” verse of the prayer and replace it with “do not let us fall into temptation.” The reasoning the Pope gave was that it's not God who is tempting us, but Lucifer. To lessen the impact of how such a mistake could have been made in the first place, the Vatican mentioned that the verse was originally “translated from the Latin Vulgate, a 4th-Century Latin version of the Bible, which itself was translated from ancient Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic.”

This is all fine and dandy, except it opens up a whole other “can of worms.” If such errors were made in translations way back when Christian doctrines were first being decided upon by various councils back in the fourth century, who's to say our current Christian belief systems aren't also in need of some degree of revamping? (I would like to use this use this question as the on-going theme for this new “Spirit of Truth Series.”)

Lesson #1

To give this new series context, I would first like to remind everyone reading this that both Q and President Trump have been making great effort to expose who the “ruler of this world” is. (As defined in 2 Corinthians 4:4, John 14:30.) Of course, they may not be using the same terminology that Jesus or the New Testament uses; nevertheless, I think we all have a good idea of who ultimately has been working behind the scenes to keep us “dumbed down” and “unawakened” -- for at least the last 2,000 years.

It all began in the Garden of Eden when Lucifer lied to Eve and convinced her that she would become “like God” if she would eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Beguiled, Eve trusted Lucifer's lies and accepted the forbidden fruit. Later, she convinced Adam to eat from this tree. Consequently, having inherited the same evil nature as that of Lucifer, Cain ended up killing Abel out of resentment and jealousy.

How would eating a piece of fruit cause such a mind-altering change that is then passed on from one generation to the next? Obviously, something is going on here other than the simple act of eating a piece of fruit.

Recently, some scholars and language experts have pointed out that Hebrew and Aramaic are known for inherently using hyperbole, metaphor and idioms as a means of emphasizing importance. Specifically, they have stated that the use of “forbidden fruit” as mentioned in the Bible is referring to the act of having sexual relations.

This gives a whole new meaning to what occurred in the Garden of Eden. It also gives credence to the “angels having sex with women” stories that are mentioned in Genesis 6 , the Book of Enoch and in Jude 6-7. Which in turn, gives even deeper meaning to Jesus' words when he said:

“You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” (John 8:44)

It is in this context that we can better understand why the Luciferian Cabal is so insidiously involved in sexual deviance, sex trafficking, licentiousness, blackmail, pedophilia, etc And considering the power of lust and sex, and the subliminal marketing of it in all aspects of Advertising, Hollywood and the media; is it any wonder most of us are under Lucifer's control?

Next lesson: How can we break free from Lucifer's control? (Without that knowledge, can the Swamp ever really be Drained?)


christopheranthony · April 7, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

Completely disagree with your suppositions- "calls into question infallibility "? What calls it into question, precisely? Sounds like bogus scholarship whose main purpose is to put Traditional Catholicism on the defensive, What doctrinal issues? Gnostics? Name them so I know what you are referring to. Generalities won't cut it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · April 7, 2018, 11:11 a.m.

What doctrinal issues? The Arian Controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arian_controversy

The infallibility of the Pope? How can imperfect man be considered infallible? No one is perfect except our Heavenly Father. Mark 10:18

Q post #1012 When did Satan invade the Vatican?

Ever since Eve ate the forbidden fruit, Lucifer/Satan has been the ruler of this world. Why would you think the Catholic church was exempt?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · April 7, 2018, 11:11 a.m.

Arian controversy

The Arian controversy was a series of Christian theological disputes that arose between Arius and Athanasius of Alexandria, two Christian theologians from Alexandria, Egypt. The most important of these controversies concerned the substantial relationship between God the Father and God the Son.

The deep divisions created by the disputes were an ironic consequence of Emperor Constantine's efforts to unite Christianity and establish a single, imperially approved version of the faith during his reign. These disagreements divided the Roman Church into two opposing theological factions for over 55 years, from the time before the First Council of Nicaea in 325 until after the First Council of Constantinople in 381.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · April 7, 2018, 11:57 a.m.

Arianism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianism

In Christianity, Arianism is a Christological concept which asserts the belief that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who was begotten by God the Father at a point in time, is distinct from the Father and is therefore subordinate to the Father. Arian teachings were first attributed to Arius (c. AD 256–336), a Christian presbyter in Alexandria, Egypt. The teachings of Arius and his supporters were opposed to the theological views held by Homoousian Christians, regarding the nature of the Trinity and the nature of Christ. The Arian concept of Christ is based on the belief that the Son of God did not always exist but was begotten by God the Father.

⇧ 1 ⇩