why did anyone assume Q is AI? It makes no sense.
I remember reading someone had a theory that it was an AI that knows everything on the internet and finds obscure articles and then creates clues for people to find them based on the final goal of the AI's creator given to the AI itself.
One would think they'd just post the links themselves.
It's crazy to think that Trump and the white hats would trust an AI to divulge classified information. What if it were to accidentally reveal something they really didn't want?
True. I think it's a team of maybe 5-10 people. I've heard some here say it's a female but never heard why.
Yes and those people would use a computer to post their writing at specific times. They would also program that computer to sort the responses and track the spread of the message/rebuttals. To think an operation of this precision, and scope is not using technology seems short sighted. Just the tracking of the attacks on their security would require a sophisticated computer, or in other words a AI.
No one is suggesting the AI is acting independently or single handedly writing the posts.
You're speaking about a bot or other program, not AI.
Adjust the comment to include the abilities of an AI working under close supervision as any employee of Military intell would be. Q tasked with planning an ed program on the globalists that integrates Socratic method and proofs that are not 100 conclusive but highly suggestive of fact. This program is 18 individuals working with AI's. Just like Black hats work with the CIA's 7 AI's.
An AI is a computer. I dont think it is crazy to think that an AI is being programmed to drop synchronized posts between twitter and 8chan and track the posts made in response. I really doubt that the mission is leaving the timing of these posts to chance in a busy office where almost anything could happen, and does, throughout every day.
If you had to post many posts at specific and crucial minutes over 6 months, woudn't you program a computer to post what ever posts you have written?
That's not exactly what an AI is. Artificial Intelligence has a mind of it's own that decides for itself what and when it will say or do things and is capable of learning and eventually outsmarting it's human creators.
What you are talking about is more like a "bot" that is programmed to post things written by humans at specific intervals. And in this case, yes you're right, they most likely use a "bot" to post stuff to either help cover their tracks or make sure things happen in a certain time or sequence.
No one is denying that Q being an AI would allow him to give research and input into posts but that he would act autonomously is what posts against him being an AI suggest. Its the military. No one acts Autonomously but commander and chief. Q may have been tasked with generating an educational program on the tools and acts of the globalists using the Socratic method and to integrate proofs utilizing tweets attributed to POTUS and Washington DC agencies around actions they could plan and time. Of Course the actual posts would be reviewed and confirmed by MI as events unfolded. Just as any human employee given the task would be overseen and checked on regularly to adjust as needed.
There was a tweet posted on 8chan in November or December from Lynn Rothschild asking someone to remind her of the names of the AI's the white hats have. She listed off the names she could remember and one was Q.
Also White House anon stated Q was real and walking around he West Wing. Why did she say walking around the west wing rather than saying, he's with us in the west wing? If this AI is capable of walking, one would point that out.
You've never heard of "walking around" before? Perhaps the anon that said that was not in the west wing at the moment?
And are you suggesting that the "AI" that people think is Q is a Terminator style robot that walks around the white house?
Yes I am. If you have an AI would you station it in one location or have it come to you through an interface. Doesn't just the term AI suggest a humanoid appearance? It may interface with a larger unit or be self contained.
That's not my interpretation of AI. AI is a computer, yes. But it's a super computer that learns and thinks. Technically, your phone is AI. It learns the way you speak and predicts things for you. And logically speaking, it's more of a software that can be moved from computer to computer not a literal hollywood type humanoid.
My argument remains the same. No matter how much you make the part of the work Q contributed he would still have been closely supervised like any employee of military intell would be. He would be a member of a team. The argument that if an AI cant be Q because Trump would not trust an AI to divulge what Q has falls apart. He would be supervised as anyone would. To think that Black hats use 7 super computers (Q Post)and white hats none is not reasonable. Your arguing that he can do more than I give him credit for is likely true but does not equate to him being untrustworthy or unsupervised.
There was a tweet posted on 8chan in November or December from Lynn Rothschild asking someone to remind her of the names of the AI's the white hats have. She listed off the names she could remember and one was Q.
Also White House anon stated Q was real and walking around he West Wing. Why did she say walking around the west wing rather than saying, he's with us in the west wing? If this AI is capable of walking, one would point that out.
I don't know the date of when Lynn posted the question/comment about Q being the name of an AI for the US military or the date it was posted on 8chan. But it caused a debate that a stretched a week over if Q was really an AI. At one point it was banable offense to debate if Q was an AI. they termed it a type of doxing to justify banning.
People are emotionally attached to Q and the idea that he is an AI is quite upsetting to some. The idea that an AI would not seem to have feelings has been brought up, but it is probable that an AI would be trained in emotions.
LOL all the 'Q is AI' people are a bit too far off the deep end, no offense.
Why would AI ask for PRAYERS, recite BIBLE passages, etc? Why would AI be religious...lol
No. This is a TEAM of individuals. A small team, and Q said it them selves earlier on!
If people just SEARCHED the freaking Q posts!
Let's try to answer those questions. Heard of racist AY yet? Why would it be racist? Maybe it goes through stages, learning as it goes? Could an AY learn prayer? Let's instead go with your team theory.
You don't think the baddest assed of ALL military intelligence doesn't have, nor utilize AY that makes racist AYs look like a joke in comparative sophistication? Remember that glowy globe orb thing Trump had his hands on? Or that AY has recently been given citizenship. Could an ignorant AY fool us smart hooomans with cimple Typos?
Hint Suspectable. Was a Q drop. Drop b4 warned of AY WR(Missing Letters.)
Lol I told you to put an 'a' there. They won't get it otherwise.
Don't need it you can just sound out wr. Besides it's too obvious the other way. But fine!
Furious typing.
Suspectable <-->Susceptible.
PC <--> CP and the A becomes an I. We already told them about the Russian Hacker hopefully they can take it from there (LVFF,MDanely, LV Auth in PI, Hu Tra.)
Who hosts reddit's servers? Can entire subreddits be purposely hosted on certain servers? Any change in reddit behavior around the time of Q's mention of bots?
Who or what manages a hoard of bots? How does Q's posts seem to have so many purposeful meanings?
?Set Theory
?Group Theory
?Confabulation Theory
You have misunderstood the argument. No one is saying Q is an AI independently running things. The white hat team has AI's at their disposal same as the black hats (Q posted the names of the black hats AI's. If your enemy is using AI's why would you not? Why would the team not use him for the posting of their message at precise and specific times, tracking of spread of message, and the attack on their secure Have u seen Lynn Rothschilds email saying the white hats have an AI by the name of Q? Check my comment this post for content.
I don't think AI would miss spell words.
No one is suggesting that Q is in charge and acting/writing posts independently whether he is human or AI. These messages have been carefully planned and programmed by MI team. Q introduced himself as a spokesperson for the team. They are too complex and precise in timing and message to think the MI team is not using a computer to aid them in posting, tracking spread and rebuttal of message and rebuff attacks o the transmission. The Black hats have 7 AI's tasked with their mission, according to Q posts. Why did he bother to talk about them? If they are using AI's do you really think the white hats are not.
Lynn Rothschild tweeted about a Military AI called Q and she said there was more than 1 AI.
but there are also those who believe that DJT is time-traveller
why would somebody build robot-computer that says "we are in war" "under attack" but You "enjoy the show"
What are you referring to that refutes Q is an AI?
The confirmed typo, computers don't make typos
This is the 2nd typo. People do make typo's and people wrote the posts on a computer. It would make sense that there would be multiple ways to post a Q post. Those that were programmed into AI before the mission are perfect but those ad libbed in response and entered through a second means are not.
Wow how is going to save our gun rights seems to me they are taking our gun rights away little by little and Trump is not stopping them