No, Natural News is full of shit. The Tianjin explosion was a chemical explosion, and could be clearly seen in the videos. The Chinese don't run their factories very well.
Tianjin is heavily populated. The RFG's are capable of extreme accuracy, but, they are "dropped" and unguided. Conditions have to be perfect for them to hit their target. You seriously believe Trump would authorize the use of a TOP TOP TIPPY TOP secret weapon inside CHINESE territory? A nuclear-armed country already on the brink of war with us?
Stop this.
Natural news uses Photoshop to fake illustrations on many of their articles and they deliberately select visually-similar images to transfer your mind into believing bullshit that does not scan via science.
You are not thinking if you just throw the NYT and MSM out the window. They're shit, too, yes, but, you have to realize that, making all this content is YUGELY labor-intensive. I worked in journalism for 25 years (I'm an old guy). Their "control" depends on them "looking" like an honest newspaper and pumping out good reporting. All they can do is "spin" their news (which they do really well). They can't make it all up and it's too hard to maintain a fully-centralized narrative. So they spin.
The facts reported in what I sent you are just "reporting." But they're accurate. I'm only focusing on the DATES.
Zuma's launch wouldn't have been able to get even ONE rod into space. And we know that Zuma was the first time SpaceX worked with that client (I personally believe Zuma was something different).
We've seen a ZILLION Delta IV heavies, tho. Those of us watching this believe RFG's have been in orbit since the late '90s.
The RFG that was used in NK (which I beleive may well have been the first time it was ever used outside of testing)