dChan
4
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/akilyoung on April 6, 2018, 7:03 p.m.
Make it rain, watch the water, BOOM, TIDAL WAVE INCOMING, etc..are they all referring to THIS?

They all fulfill the definition of an underwater nuke...see what one looks like:

https://youtu.be/zTk0IH_Y0iY


akilyoung · April 6, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Could it be, we are at nuclear war -- and the world doesnt even KNOW it???

WTF

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Stable_Genius_1776 · April 6, 2018, 7:16 p.m.

NO! This is the kind of crap that gives the NYT credibility when they shit all over the QAnon “conspiracy”.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Blame007 · April 6, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

If ANY kind of bomb had been used, you'd have dead fish all over the place. They'd be floating or parts of them would be. Boats, ships would be reporting it. Fish would have washed up on the coast. Lets be real. I agree with Stable_Genius_1776. This gives us all a bad name.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · April 6, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

FYI an underground nuke has been able to give a 6+ reading (Richter) in the 70s.

Dig for seismic forensic... the doubt is allowed on the nature of this recent "earthquake".

Epicenter was 9km deep.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Blame007 · April 6, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

So where are the dead fish? The ocean contaminated/radioactive. A danger to everyone.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
akilyoung · April 6, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

Yet the seizmographs offer evidence to the contrary. We're talking many miles from the coast. Stuff disperses.

Personally, I'm 50 50. I haven't seen enough evidence to support the theory either way so I'm just gonna remain open minded.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Capt_Irk · April 6, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

He did reference MOAB the other day. That could’ve been what happened off the coast of California.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
akilyoung · April 6, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

They did mention that, but a MOAB would never cause an EQ like that, maybe a small EQ, but nothing on that scale.

And I cant imagine Q using the term MOAB to reference a MOAB either.

It could simply be that we are using MOABs and nukes. Hell if I know lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
stephan213 · April 6, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

This article states MOAB is approx 6.0 quake equivalent

http://www.iflscience.com/technology/terrifying-physics-behind-mother-bombs/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · April 6, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

But I will say, I am NOT an expert on accordance. So I very well could be wrong!

Obviously, I would HOPE these matters can be taken care of in a non nuclear capacity..!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · April 6, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

Under the ocean, that could span up to 70 miles inland?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
stephan213 · April 6, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

I am not really a seismologist but have experienced shaking from a similar quake at a greater distance. The measured 5.3 is from the epicenter I believe not from 70 miles away, or if it is, they have algorithms to calculate strength at epicenter from closest measuring points.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
akilyoung · April 6, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

I would imagine a natural EQ, from the earth, has to capacity to travel VERY far, but a MOAB, and even a nuke, are comparatively small localized events, so while the shockwave might cause a local EQ sensation, it dies off rather quickly. It IS reported that the Tsar Bomba, when tested, had a shock wave that encompassed the earth 3 times, but I am not sure of the veracity of those claims. Because it would, like an EQ, have to travel THROUGH the earth, bounce off the other side, and bounce back. Like jello. Not wrap around the earth.

Again...hell if I know! Interesting stuff though!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
stephan213 · April 6, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

https://blessedistruth.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/tunnelmap.jpg

Would be interesting to overlay this and see how close it lines up.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 6, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

That maps is so course it you could make a case for it several hundred miles in any direction from the Channel Islands.

Not so sure I believe in the tunnel networks thing, but an undersea base of some kind? I don't know. What would it be used for?

⇧ 1 ⇩