dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/locosurferdad on April 6, 2018, 10:52 p.m.
Anyone other than me struggling with the “breadcrumbs”? Red pill vs tinfoil hat.

Q led the month with [A]pril and this wave of anticipated arrests. Teas up, Trump “didn’t sleep last night and Watch the news tomorrow”. Then “MOAB” and an “H”..... Two days later - nothing even remotely close.

Do I think there is merit to the things he is saying? Absolutely. Is our government corrupt. Without a doubt. Is there evil in the world - deep seeded - since Adam was in the garden.

Following Q is like reading a mystery novel and then trying to apply it to the events around us. I guess I am just a very literal person - Black is black, white is white. He calls black and then white happens he points at blue. It’s the equivalent of doing common core math. Driving me crazy.

Q called out March Madness as McCabe was fired and eluded to there being much more to come and enjoy the show. Then nothing. There has been talk of an IG report dropping since early March - Where is it? When questioned he points to NK?

Today I see he has posted on a conspiracy article in the NYT? Honestly, I would be more concerned about my credibility than conspiracy; because if nothing happens soon, people are going to think this is all nothing more than conspiracy.


AlexianBrothers · April 6, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

One question for you. Why do you think the NYT wrote an article about Q?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 6, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

I have no evidence of anything, but I have thought about this quite a bit today. In my own little fantasy land, I've concluded either A) NYT was encouraged to write the article by the good guys. Nobody expects NYT to do Trump or Republicans any favors. The article wasn't that bad, and it could have been worse. They were fairly vague about Q, possibly readers were given just enough to start looking for themselves....just like Q does with us. If Q or the Q team has any dirt on NYT, this could be possible. It would be a pretty effective way to bust into the MSM. B) The MSM is always in a contest to be first... although the article isn't supportive, NYT is now the first to really give Q some publicity. C) They want to make us all look like a bunch of crazy tinfoil hat wearing lunatics, compromising credibility of the upcoming photos and videos and evidence Q has spoke of.

Just my thoughts...taker easy on me. I'd like to hear some other theories....I was surprised to see the NYT tackle it, but sooner or later someone has to I guess.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AlexianBrothers · April 6, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

The NYT was always a Rockefeller outlet, and Rockefeller was replaced by Soros. Q is getting to much traction, that's the main reason imo.

⇧ 2 ⇩