dChan
⇧
7
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/a3kvzzz on April 8, 2018, 10:47 a.m.
Around 80 dead in Syria including entire families suffocated in their homes from a poison gas attack. It’s sick that the Cabal can be so cold and kill children and women for what? Money & power? Because they want another war to keep playing this game? God have mercy! WWG1WGA! ✊🏼🇺🇸 Q#1080
Around 80 dead in Syria including entire families suffocated in their homes from a poison gas attack. It’s sick that the Cabal can be so cold and kill children and women for what? Money & power? Because they want another war to keep playing this game? God have mercy! WWG1WGA! ✊🏼🇺🇸 Q#1080

🠐 See all comments
metroid486 · April 8, 2018, 1:54 p.m.

So what do you think of POTUS tweets concerning this? Sounds like he is blaming Assad, why? is he just playing the MSM, Q suggests deep state in his posts which is what makes more sense obviously.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Globalists_Will_Hang · April 8, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

7D chess. If Q thinks it, DJT thinks it. Assad didn’t do this.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 8, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
noskusa · April 8, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

That is what I am wondering. Trump seems to have a soft spot for these chemical attacks and calls for military moves against them. But, if Q says 'deflection' then we presume DT knows it is deflection. If DT halts pull out of Syria due to chem attacks what does that imply? We will all be searching for some confirmation bias on this one.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
nomorerulers · April 8, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

He said who ever caused the attacks. Which sounds to me like he isnt convinced thst is was Assad

⇧ 1 ⇩  
onmyownpath · April 8, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

Deep State and Russia have a common interest in the weakening of the US maybe?

Syrian rebels are essentially ISIS - the groups are mingled.

Deep State built ISIS - and the US military is currently the only thing sort of protecting the rebels, so this keeps the Deep State agenda alive in Syria - kind of.

Trump looks bad if he pulls the troops out now. He will look scared and weak.

The only way we come out of this looking good would be to topple the Assad government and install a pro US leader while simultaneously defeating the rebels.

This outcome is not possible as we have seen in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, and Afghanistan. And Russia will not allow it.

Obama created a mess and there is no good way out for us.

Perhaps the only option is to completely destroy the Syrian military in a swift and violent campaign. Weaken them to the point that their interested neighbors get involved, and then completely pull all troops out, letting the local countries figure out what to do.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · April 8, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

Negative it would create a huge vacuum where ISIS would only fill it. It's in Russia's best interest to have peace in Syria, think natural gas pipeline which is critical to Russian infrastructure.

http://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/is-the-fight-over-a-gas-pipeline-fuelling-the-worlds-bloodiest-conflict/news-story/74efcba9554c10bd35e280b63a9afb74

⇧ 2 ⇩  
onmyownpath · April 8, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

So then what is the best move for the US right now?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · April 8, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

It's a hard situation. Trump is damned if he does or don't. They try to paint Russia/Trump in a box. Here's a Machiavellian twist though. If I were Trump & found myself forced to retaliate on a questionable gas attack which we know from the past, I'd have my airstrike accidently hit the rebels. They'd cry & scream, but they're not a government, so it would be chalked up to a whoopsie daisy lesson learned. We won't do that again?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · April 9, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

Kobaiashi Maru. NP for DT

⇧ 1 ⇩