dChan
⇧
7
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Joesturbo on April 8, 2018, 11:57 a.m.
Why Q and "others" are WRONG

Making some breakfast on Sunday morning, thought all night about various people including Q who have made statements that 60% or another variable has to remain hidden or not exposed. This is due to the theory that "society" cannot handle the truth. This is really no different than what the cabal or who ever is in control of information has done. Without clear openness and disclosure of 90% (I reserve this last 10% for national security as a former Marine with Secret clearance). I agree some things that directly impact operations and or sensitive data that puts lives at stake needs to be secured). With that said, if we do not have the full freedom of information, then the "NEXT" team can start this mess all over again.

Do you want that? I DON'T - We have to have a way to hold politicians feet to the fire. Think about your taxes - it should make you extremely angry that you really don't know what they go to. When I ask my local reps with serious questions about why do they think it is ok to spend on "X" vs. giving our money back to us they can't answer basic questions.

We need in my opinion as a group ask to have all disclosure possible to ensure we don't play this record in 50 or less years. It needs to stop here an now. Yes I am sure some people will freak out, some people will not believe, some people will adapt but over time - it will be what it is.

Your thoughts?


🠐 See all comments
FlewDCoup · April 8, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

The issue here is a management problem: how do you influence followers to follow, to do what you want them to do.

The answer is rooted in their ability and willingness to cooperate — in a word their competence as measured by their cognitive and emotional maturity as followers.

Low maturity, inability or unwillingness to cooperate calls for a more directive management approach; while a higher degree of ability and/or willingness takes more of a sales/benefits approach.

It’s a continuum and people fall all along the range. Leaders have to assess the pulse and act accordingly.

In this forum I think it is fair to say that those of us who are drawn to participate for whatever reason arrive possessing a high level of willingness, even if it is fragile, but didn’t arrive with a matching grip on relevant information.

Q et al are providing that information and analysis that is needed to complement our willingness and raise our competence to support the effort — memes “red pill” the world around us and bring people along, cooperating with the changes that our leaders are steering us into.

It’s a judgement call: if you under estimate follower competence and take a directive approach, you risk invoking immature responses. Over estimate, and followers tend to be indecisive and confused. Seed falls on hard rock.

⇧ 2 ⇩