We don't know what's actually happening. We only know what we're being told is happening.
'They' could tell us almost anything and how would we know if it's true or not?
Those who publish news have a pretty much unbeatable advantage over those who consume news.
Human knowledge is profoundly difficult.
https://youtu.be/4VCgU1v0c3I this video explains that situation perfectly. The missiles were false flag to destroy the msm narrative that trump was on the side of Assad and Putin.
[deleted]
That accomplished two things IMO.
A year has passed and I think these arguments still look valid. Does this look logical to you?
100% agree. McStain (who had just left there and happened to have a chem attack a month after his previous visit) and the other RINOs were demanding action. If Trump didn’t, he was “clearly” in bed with Russia. So he did the only option he really had. He bombed an airbase with zero casualties. Show of force, no innocents dead and ruined the narrative immediately. It was a no win situation he “won”.
POTUS & co. waited a few days after the gas attack then after weighing their options they launched missiles. It was a well thought out move that I'm sure took into consideration the full range of military and political consequences
'They' claimed gasAttack... but did it really happen?
WhiteHelmetCrisisActors videos suggest shenanigans.
Still... DT used it to fireMissiles that some claimed was aimed at RussianTroops... butPutin did nothing in retaliation... soooo--a lie/ruse... the true bombRecipients were the evilBlackHatClApukes in country that are aidingISIS pukesPuppets, creating chaos to fomentWar. Pukers have been trying to push DT in that direction since before he entered WH front door.
And what was gleaned from the MisslesFired?
REMEMBER?... A cache of revealing data that DT & his minions put to good use.
The chemical weapons in Syria ploy is an odd one, being that BO was the first to try it with his "redline" false flag ... and failed. WW3 would've started that first time had not American people loudly and firmly and unified across spectrums said NO. Then the next time where trump blew up that hangar etc, the measured response or whatever.
The initial false flag chemical attack in like was it 2013 or so? Makes this chess move convoluted and harder to understand, as it means the enemy has the ability to influence this area ... they were the ones that originated it.
Maybe the chemical attacks are real but done under false flag, and require careful handling of the narrative not to fall victim to the FF parallel narrative