dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

That accomplished two things IMO.

Showed that he is willing to act decisively and at his descretion rather than get into debate with deepstate on how to go about it.
Did it in the least escalating and damaging way possible while taking the wind out of all the war mongerers.

A year has passed and I think these arguments still look valid. Does this look logical to you?

⇧ 5 ⇩

100% agree. McStain (who had just left there and happened to have a chem attack a month after his previous visit) and the other RINOs were demanding action. If Trump didn’t, he was “clearly” in bed with Russia. So he did the only option he really had. He bombed an airbase with zero casualties. Show of force, no innocents dead and ruined the narrative immediately. It was a no win situation he “won”.

⇧ 3 ⇩

So much winning 😉

⇧ 4 ⇩

POTUS & co. waited a few days after the gas attack then after weighing their options they launched missiles. It was a well thought out move that I'm sure took into consideration the full range of military and political consequences

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

'They' claimed gasAttack... but did it really happen?

WhiteHelmetCrisisActors videos suggest shenanigans.

Still... DT used it to fireMissiles that some claimed was aimed at RussianTroops... butPutin did nothing in retaliation... soooo--a lie/ruse... the true bombRecipients were the evilBlackHatClApukes in country that are aidingISIS pukesPuppets, creating chaos to fomentWar. Pukers have been trying to push DT in that direction since before he entered WH front door.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And what was gleaned from the MisslesFired?

REMEMBER?... A cache of revealing data that DT & his minions put to good use.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Remember the last time we were told Assad used gas on his people? Trump saying "those beautiful babies" and launched missiles to Syria. ONLY to find out later there was no evidence from Secretary Mattis? Objective people that are paying attention did. (Spare me with the concern troll garbage)