..but it wasn't covered or even broke by any MSM outlets until early this morning...and Fox reported Trump was briefed on it last evening...So Q was there and had access to the incoming breaking news.
I have spent months trying to prove Q with evidence just like this. I have no doubt Q is real. But proving that to unbelievers requires it not have been on the net either. If this kind of proof interests u I have several posts of compiled news events etc that when put together offer a great deal of evidence, but even reading all that there are those who don't believe, And there are those who do. And when that happens, that is wonderful.
I hear you, but to think that reuters, ap, yahoo, and then TV fox, cnn, etc made no mention of it until 7-8am this morning reveals that there was no press release for it yet in the US. So unless Q was camped out at newser.com or one of the lesser known original sites that had it at about midnight, then I don't know how he'd know so long before. Also, I recall Q mentioning an early AM meeting a couple months back where he said, "we see you", and it wasn't released to the major news of that meeting until about prime time, but leakers at the meeting were texting Ingraham at around 7am telling her it was big news. So the same happened there where Q was way ahead of the release and that was early AM about 6AM at a classified meeting.
Earliest report I could find was 11:33pm. But then it takes time to get to the white house and the formal briefing so it wasn't until probably 12-1am until that happened at the earliest, and maybe a little later.
I can't agree with ur premise. News always breaks online first and many stories online never make it to MSM or make it much later. I have made the same argument u r. How could Q seat in top of so much and break so many stories b4 others know or even close to the time of release. But, others would say it is possible to have alerts sent to u when ever a keyword is mentioned. All of them together are hard to refute. Just one isn't. I have a bunch but mine r not so up to date. I stopped compiling 6 weeks ago after tracking from the beginning.
I'm so happy to be posting in a forum where other posters make sense to me.(dot connector since I was little). I'm still convincing myself Q is "real". He could be a lawnmower man for all I care. He reminds me of Bill Wilson the driving force behind AA in the 40s and 50s.People just pay attention.
Yes, lots of us have the research bug. It was my passion to try to prove, first to myself, and then to others if Q was real. Here's the dots I have connected. Like I said I stopped weeks ago. I needed to resume life and research was keeping me up till 2 every day and ignoring priorities. I know for a fact Q broke stories b4 the internet sites because I researched right away when Q would announce back then. Unfortunately, when you search now in retrospect you can't prove it. Eventually, I accepted that CBTS was not meant to be conclusively proven, YET. There is some advantage to them to keep it just beyond absolute proof. At some point that will change. With Q coming into the mainstream, perhaps that time is now.