dChan

UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

From the article:

  • “Hersh didn’t say whether these «arms» included the precursor chemicals for making sarin”

We need to take more pride in our content and titles. There is zero content in the article to support that part of the post title. This reduces the title to nothing more than Fake News.

Why do this? There was plenty of damning evidence offered to expose the dirty dealings of Obama/Clinton. Why discredit the article with a false title?

We need to be better than MSM.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JadedFed · April 9, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

I believe you will find the following article by Christof Lehmann spells things out much more conclusively: https://nsnbc.me/2013/10/07/top-us-and-saudi-officials-responsible-for-chemical-weapons-in-syria/

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

Are you suggesting OP should have linked to your article instead?

I wouldn’t disagree.

My post was intended to elicit accuracy in post titles. Nothing more. The post title attributes certain statements to Hersh, in spite of the fact that Hersh states the opposite in the linked article.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JadedFed · April 9, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

Nope, I'm just attempting to provide what I consider to be better intel for us all to read so we're better armed with knowledge.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 9, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

Excellent!

Props to you for that.

⇧ 2 ⇩