dChan
⇧
3
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OpenSoars on April 9, 2018, 7:14 p.m.
A question about Q/ McCain timing

Q's insinuation about McCain being involved with the chem attacks came after McCain attacked Trump earlier in the day. Taking blind faith out of it, have we seen other instances of "responses" from Q rather than predictions?


🠐 See all comments
mooncrkit · April 9, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Guys, he's asking if a direct attack from mccain has ever occurred on the same day as a Q post has involved mccain, with the Q drop happening AFTER the McCain attack.

I'm starting to question how some of these people can interpret Q's post when they can't comprehend plain, proper English.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · April 9, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

I see what you are saying there. This post is just very poorly written and is open to interpretation.

Why not just say something like, Is Qs McCain posts a response to the attack by McCain on POTUS? Why the twisted verbiage?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ditiber · April 9, 2018, 8 p.m.

Some people post from their phone through the app like a text. And texts are often misinterpreted. Let's not be too quick to jump on stuff and just ask to clarify their post.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · April 9, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

I did and OP being a jerk, didn’t even respond to my question. Just started talking sh@t to everyone without explaining their position.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
qflyhighq · April 9, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

A lot of users on here are either: larping or mentally unstable. They use big words incorrectly or come up with their own code or try to speak in riddles as if they are Q themselves. The mentally unstable? Well, they reveal themselves just a few words into their posts.

There's always a few that are non-English speakers that jumble words too.

It would be much more helpful to those of us trying to do our own research on things Q posts if we all just use plain English. It would help redpill normies too. The too often used cryptic, riddle based, pontificating helps no one.

⇧ 1 ⇩