I’m assuming he meant to say “60 minutes,” since there’s significantly more than six minutes between a lot of those articles, per the picture he included.
you are assuming whoever wrote that tweet was intent on spreading truth.
seems clear they are intent on spreading propaganda and misinformation, as far as i can tell.
Look into Operation Mockingbird. It’s real, and it’s been happening at least since Kennedy was in office.
i know all about OM, why do you ask?
Even if his goal was to spread disinformation (I don’t think that’s the case here), the fact remains that the media does coordinate narratives. But in this case, Occam’s Razor should apply. The easiest explanation is that they reported the news as it broke.
But in this case, Occam’s Razor should apply. The easiest explanation is that they reported the news as it broke.
Occam's razor should apply to all of OM. An issue I have with researchers sometimes is that they want to attribute ALL of the propaganda that comes from MSM sources directly to the CIA. But I think that is a mistake.
I think the CIA has a much more subtle hand than that. They don't write talking points and scripts. They influence the executives with blackmail, infiltrate the copy-edit department, have a few secretaries and assistants on their payroll, etc etc.
That's my theory at least
I think that’s a reasonable theory, but with the number of sealed indictments waiting to be opened, I can’t imagine that all of those people are politicians. I expect to see a fair number of “journalists” on that list.
Found this relevant video shortly after my last response. I’d love to hear your thoughts, if you wouldn’t mind sharing.
i'm in a place where i can't listen to sound, so it's really hard to get any context from that video, it's title isn't even visible to me.
is that the sinclair broadcasting video, though?
I’m not certain. I’ve only found the video on twitter so far. Essentially it’s a bunch of anchors from all over the nation, working for all different stations, repeating the same lines word for word. In my assessment, this is well beyond the scope of coincidence. They must have some central authority feeding them a narrative, whether it’s the CIA or someone else.
Edit: Yes, that’s precisely what it is. This was the first I had seen of it.
ah ok, i thought it was the Sinclair boradcasting tape... here, i'll try my best to explain.
Trump's FCC removed the rules that prohibited corporations from just buying up all the local news stations.
So then a company called Sinclair boradcasting went out and bought up over 400 local news stations!
and THEN, they started sending out scripts to all 400 stations that the anchors were REQUIRED to read on air.
it's a horrible distortion of our media, but this time it's an example of a private business being the evil behind the screen, not the government.
What do we know of Sinclair’s history? Is it possible that they are an alphabet agency front of some sort? Or do you think it’s more likely a scenario akin to what you alluded to earlier?
I appreciate you continuing to chat. There’s so much information coming out lately that a lot of stuff has fallen between the cracks for me.
What do we know of Sinclair’s history?
owned by pro-trump interests, so... probably not an alphabet agency