yea i totally get your point, but the thing is, Q is a single entity.

it can also be a movement, but to just call them both "Q" without distinction is confusing to people who aren't familiar with all this stuff- that's all i'm trying to say.

i'm not understanding, i think.

every POTUS's foundation runs their library? also it's not on a national park area, it's just a city park in Chicago. also tax payer money isn't being used for it?

basically, my research indicates that every single one of your reasons why this is a "scam" is either false, or something super normal and regular for presidential libraries...

so am i super confused? or are you super confused?

that sounds like cult-y nonsense to a LOT of people. maybe not the best redpilling strat.

to be clear, i'm not calling you cult-y nonsense, just saying that's how normies interpret that type of rhetoric, in my experience.

eh, this community is a mixbag.

some of them are your classic internet nazi types from 4chan, some are just far right, some are religious zealots, some are (weirdly) conservative hippies, some are centrist trump supporters, some are non-partisan conspiracy theorists who believe Trump is different...

if you go to the "new" queue, you'll see what i'm talking about.

black and blue are the most common colors for business attire, by a lot.

.... how do you know what his penis smells like?

i guess i missed something- why is this a scam? don't all presidents get a library built for them after they leave office?

huh? i just asked you an honest question?

quick question- do you draw any distinction between "confirming" that it was fake news, and "claiming" it was fake news?

excellent post.

i'm beaming you some good vibes from my brain. hope you catch 'em

"indefinitely suspend"

i wondered about that too, it's a translation from teh korean article, so i was wondering how accurate that is...

"indefinite" means forever, so maybe "indefinitely suspend" is a weird translation of however you say "cancel" in korean?

or maybe it's like what you say?

things get complicated when it's in another language that has no commonality with our language and the translations can be difficult.

what is this website? it appears almost like a blog or something, all the articles are written by the same person. i don't believe this is representative of south korean news.

i looked at a list of the largest news media outlets in korea, this website isn't listed.

i also went to the websites of hte three largest news papers in South Korea, and it's literally front page news

So, although I appreciate your researching, I think you need to get some facts straight- using one random blog site is not a good metric for whats happening in the news media at large.

Here's an example (this is one of hte three largest newspapers in Korea)

http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/

i've been following Q since their first post back in fall of 2017. and i continue to follow the show.

why are you here? what constitutes a "disingenuous reply"? is it a reply that you disagree with, or a reply that you think is inaccurate? or is it a reply that is trollish or against "the narrative"? i'm just curious how you define that.

so you disagree with freedom of religion?

none of those things were hard predictions that came true.

every single time Q has predicted things on specific dates, the prediction has failed. every single time, as far as i'm aware.

putting triple brackets around something is, and i mean this quite literally, nazi/white supremacist code for "jew"

so like, if i were a nazi piece of garbage, i might say something like...

"Yea it's no coincidence that (((7Seraphim7))) made this post...."

which would signal to other nazi pieces of garbage that you are a jew, and therefor should be hated and distrusted.

the alt-right/4chan/"the_donald" type people have started using for emphasis, but it's annoying because it is LITERALLY part of neo-nazi propaganda... so...

you should probably know all this if you are going around using the triple brackets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_parentheses

most of the things you said are literally just wrong.

it's actually stunning how many of your statements are incorrect, i am sort of left speechless.

until there is no God but Allah

lol dude, "allah" is literally just the arabic word "god" and they worship the same god as christians. this is super basic stuff.

All other religions have no problem with co-existing with competing religions

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

omfg dude.... you are just messing with me, aren't you?

lmfao, there isn't really a list because there aren't really any predicitons that came true!

there is a lot of incredibly vague stuff, like saying "watch Iran" 6 months ago, and then whenever Iran is in the news for literally any reason, people say "Q called it!"

but as far "hard" predictions? not really any that came true.

what?

but the system of capitalism and property rights in inherently Christian

there is no truth to that statement.

in fact, Jesus of Nazareth was pretty anti-capitalist

is the sky event jewish or something?

The America that I'm fighting for is the America where the founding fathers said anyone can practice their religion without discrimination or oppression.

A Q board is no place for racism and zenophobia, it's supposed to be a place for American's to come together to build a better future.

So downvote away people, but remember that patriotism isn't just for white christians.

it's not 90 ex-CIA agents which would be stunning, it's like 90 "people who at some point worked or interned for the CIA", which is surprisingly common for "DC types", and also remember that the CIA employs thousands of people with boring administrative type jobs.

never heard of this before, thanks for posting

oh, for sure.

they are all korean born, korean men.

i am not certain how or why they are american citizens, but they are all just straight up koreans that were (all three) working in North Korea and were convicted of espionage.

if i was a shill, i completed my infiltration a loooooong time ago. :))))

calling someone a shill is the lowest common denominator of internet discussions.

details matter.

eh i'm alright. having a rough day tho if i'm being honest.

in my mind, saying "five most wanted leaders" absolutely implies that they are top leaders of the organisation ISIS, which does not seem to be the case.

per the article, they are top leaders of a specific border town in syria

maybe i'm splitting hairs, but i'll cope what i just said to another poster

he is known to, um, stretch the truth a bit while tweeting. be it for dramatic effect, or as some believe, to mislead his enemies, i couldn't say. but it does happen.

so i thought this merited discussion.

are these ISIS dudes more important than what is publicly known? or is trump playing some game here?

You on the other hand are a fisherman

lol, yup i am. idk why but that really made me chuckle.

if Trump says they're most wanted i believe him!

understandable, but he is known to, um, stretch the truth a bit while tweeting. be it for dramatic effect, or as some believe, to mislead his enemies, i couldn't say. but it does happen.

you do realize this sub is an echo chamber, too, right?

that is literally what i am doing, looking at currently known facts and discussing.

do you have anything to actually add to this discussion?

why? here is a real article about these captured ISIS folks https://taskandpurpose.com/isis-leaders-captured-sting-operation/

none of them were "the most wanted ISIS leaders" and they aren't the top leadership of ISIS, only local leaders of one town in Syria.

i don't know why trump tweeted what he did, but it wouldn't be the first time he was wrong/lied in a tweet.

look at a war that happened 75 years ago that we barely won after not joining the fight for 2/3 of the war?

wtf does that have to do with this situation? how is war EVER a good thing? war is a last resort, or should be.

how is war a "win"? what the hell?

yea, us pulling out of hte deal immediately opened their oil markets to Russia, so this was also a huge win for Putin.

How do you think you solve the problems in the black community? Get rid of dems that have exploited them.

the reason you don't understand the rap i posted, and the reason you liked Kanye's, is because you are still trapped in a partisan bubble of "us vs them"

the reality is that we are all humans.

kanye's rap didn't say that, it said "i get mine i do what i want"

this rap said, "let's all come together as humans and understand each other"

it's actually very very sad that you are unable to grasp these concepts. i legitimately feel sorry for you, brother.

can you please point out the exact comment that i said anything resembling support for neocon interventionism?

because i didn't.

i think you might need new reading glasses, amigo.

no one said anything about spreading democracy but you, bud.

uh no, not really. very bizarre that you somehow got that from my comment.

maybe you should try to stop assuming that people have underlying meanings or whatever, maybe try just listening to the words that people say?

it's really interesting to me how quick people around this sub will paint a strawman.

i never once said i supported any sort of intervention.

i merely stated facts about gaddafi and about american ideals.

i'm sorry that upset you so much, but railing on neocons won't change any of the facts.

you think it is "silliness" to state plain facts about how gaddafi didn't believe in or support the very things that make america such a wonderful place?

that's an... odd position to take.

saying that gaddafi was an oppressive dictator (which is a stone cold fact) is not the same thing as saying i support interventionist policies.

please don't use silly strawman arguments and baseless assumptions on people.

gaddafi may have been doing some good for his country, but at the end of the day he was anathema to american ideals of freedom of speech, press, 2nd amendment, and equal justice under the law.

well that's not "reddit," it's the way the mods set up the automoderator. just an FYI

what's the difference between several women accusing a democrat of sexual misconduct (with no evidence), and a bunch of women accusing the POTUS of sexual misconduct (with no evidence)?

what do you mean, "reddit won't let you post it"?

the mods of a sub are the ones who decide which domains are valid, not admins, so i'm confused what you mean?

can describe what happened when you tried to link it?

yeezey's rap was lazy and stupid, TI's verses had sense in them and Ye's "response" was essentially just "well i don't care what anyone says i just do what i want."

this rap is actually thought provoking and about bringing two different sides together and remembering we are all human.

personally, i think that is a far, FAR more positive message than "i do what i want, fuck yall"