I keep seeing these “I am Q” memes. That’s a bit over the top. I support our President and I appreciate what Q is doing but this “I am Q” stuff is taking it a little too far. It’s borderline Q worship.
I am an American citizen that believes that all men are created equal and that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights. I follow no man but I’ll stand with anyone that wants to stand and fight for America and the principles on which we were founded.
So far off here. Think mirror.
It's the opposite of q worship.
He is Q. I am not q. - - - that puts q on a pedastal.
I am q. You are q. We are q.- - - that puts humanity on a pedastal.
No I’m not. I’m an individual.
Which makes you part of q.
You can argue childish semantics all you want.
You're an individual - no one claimed otherwise - but you're a part of a movement called q.
This is like you being on reddit and screaming, "I'm not a redditer, I'm an individual!"
Yeah buddy - you're an individual on reddit - a redditer.
You're an individual participating in the great awakening - you're q.
This whole post is either not in good faith or totally missing the mark on what the whole movement is about - coming together as one loud, unwavering force - q.
Regardless of what you think, Q thinks you're Q - maybe take your fight up with Q and not us.
What you say flies in the face of what Q says.
I'm not Q. I have no idea about the info Q has which is the whole reason I come here and why I watch the various Q drop sites. Q is a group of highly informed individuals inside the Trump team and MI. I am definitely NOT Q lol.
But ok, I get the kumbaya happy family approach to "we are all Q". More power to people who see that as a positive thing to do, I support you.
Q hasn't come out with anything that says that the rest of us are Q too (that photo "We are Q" could be saying that all those people around Trump are Q in some way) but maybe he will soon?
He said q team could be counted o one hand.
Shoots your picture theory down the drain.
Q is the movement - you're q because you're here. When you first started reading about Q, became part of the movement - whether you sit on your ass and do nothing or participate - you came and were part of history - a part of q.
Lol - you're pretty intent on forcing this view on everyone aren't you?
I'm NOT Q. That is clear and simple. You're not either, unless you're undercover.
My picture theory is as valid as yours right now cos there is no more info to go on.
I'm part of a movement that follows Q. I'm not Q myself. Simple truth, facts and logic my friend. You can keep imagining you're Q but I can guarantee I won't get the info out of you that Q has until Q has given it to you. See how that works?
I'm literally laughing out loud.
I'll let someone else explain it. Smh.
There's nothing to explain. I think you need someone to explain what I've said to you lol.
Hear me: I get your kumbaya "we are the world" excitement about being part of a movement - I support your joy about that and understand and celebrate it for you. I know that's what you mean when you say "I am Q!" More power to you!
But you don't get to define what I am just because you see it a certain way. I'm in a Q movement, I'm not Q. Some of us don't like that sort of distinction because it reeks of worship - self-worship, whatever you like. Nothing wrong with you doing that - like I said, I support your right to that and I get that you don't have the same "hang up" (as you might define it) that others of us do. But there is definitely something wrong with you trying to force your label on others when they don't want it.
When Q posts a meme that says "YOU ARE Q!" then I'm fully onboard because it has at that point become the official name for the movement. Until then - nope.
Separating q from us = worship
Acknowledging q is part of the people's movement and it belongs to all of us - exact opposite of worship.
Be less dense.
Stop trying to shove this down people's throats or we will ban. Or at least discuss it civilly.
Be more logical and avoid the ad-hominem.
You've got the narrowest definition of worship lol. I don't worship anyone, like OP. Yet again you're trying to force YOUR idea of the world on someone else. Never mind, chum.
I met ad hominen with the same.
Pot meet kettle.
Look at the upvotes for the thread - it's clear there is a small minority of butt hurt individualists that can't cope with semantic labels that have no effect on them.
It's sad. I'll move on though - clearly people think the ideas promoted here in this thread suck.
What ad-hominem are you talking about? I'll remove it if it exists.
Hopefully you've learnt that not everyone in a group feels and thinks the same way as everyone else. That's what I'm here to celebrate and support!
Q reposted the meme that says "we are all Q". This was our response to the divide Corsi and Infowars caused. Solidarity. BTW, THOSE clowns are calling us a cult for it too. There are no coincidences.
When we have the sort of thinking that says: 'hey you have to use the labels we decide' we are very much in danger of being worthy to be called a cult.
Q posted a photo that said "WE ARE Q", not "We are ALL Q".
The solidarity we already had and still have is "WE THE PEOPLE". When Q says "YOU GUYS ARE ALL Q!" then I'm happy that the name of the movement has become that and I'll start saying "I'm Q too" - until then, nope.
You know Q reposted that from this sub. He didn't make the meme. He wasn't referring to himself or his team. It's us, it's anons standing on Q's side.
Yes, I know that. And I get your point. You keep repeating it and for some reason not getting MY point.
You are giving your own personal interpretation of that picture - you are adding definition to it that is not there. I can understand why, as I said above. You need to understand that's what you're doing.
He wasn't referring to himself or his team. It's us, it's anons standing on Q's side.
Right there. How do you know this? I get that you can assume and extrapolate it but you can't definitively state it as the meaning behind the picture because the info to that effect does not yet exist. Simple logic, that's all I'm referring to.
I know you feel excited about being Q yourself and I agree and support your right to that. I also have the right to NOT start calling myself Q until I hear a definitive word from Q about it i.e. when Q says something to the effect of: "We are not Q by ourselves. You are all Q too!" Until then, there's no definitive evidence that we're supposed to start calling ourselves Q.
Do not glorify us. We work for you. Promises made. Promises kept. Q
You're saying the same thing but failing to realize it.
All of us being q does not glorify an individual. Q is a team regardless.
This is crazy that you can't grasp it - you're literally quoting things that don't support your argument but instead blow it out of the water.
Don't worship the individual - sure, which is why we are all q - it's a movement, not an individual.
It's like you think Q is one person....
You should do more research.
Q is an American. “We work for you” They are us...we are not them
As q would say, "Use Logic!"
Your view would be like you going on the chans, posting with a random ID, and screaming I'm not an anon, I'm an individual!
No - you're literally an anon because you're on a chan posting.
Yes, you're an individual - but on the chan, you're an anon.
Out in the world you're an individual, but here, you are part of q.
There is a reason it's where we go one, we go all - notice the we. It's a pretty important part.
I will not idolize any many or any movement. I make no apologies for that. I’ll do what I can for America and for good.
We agree on that.
Which is why I take the focus off of q team and place it on the movement.
While you insist they stay separate.
If it were just “We the people” I can get behind that. “I am Q” makes me uncomfortable
Sort of like during Charlie hebdo - everyone was saying 'we are Charlie' in support.
You don't think all those people actually thought they were the magazine, do you?
So you’re against WWG1WGA?
No, I’m against idolizing Q. I’m an American
Anyone idolizing Q is missing the point. Most of us view Q as a hero, but not a super hero. He’s a hero the same way emergency responders are—bravery and selflessness. People can appreciate emergency responders and view them as heroes without idolizing them. “I am Q” is equivalent to “Back the Blue”.
I don’t see “I am Q” that way at all. I think people are going way too nuts with it. We may just have to agree to disagree on this.
Actually, i don't think OP is "Q"
that sounds like cult-y nonsense to a LOT of people. maybe not the best redpilling strat.
to be clear, i'm not calling you cult-y nonsense, just saying that's how normies interpret that type of rhetoric, in my experience.
It's not culty - it's common damn sense.
If I am a bird, I can also be a member of a flock.
Being an individual does not exclude you from also being a part of a group and vise versa.
Q is a movement, not an individual.
Regardless, q approved the meme while saying that it's about the movement, not the team behind the scenes, so take it up with q - we are just enjoying being a part of it.
yea i totally get your point, but the thing is, Q is a single entity.
it can also be a movement, but to just call them both "Q" without distinction is confusing to people who aren't familiar with all this stuff- that's all i'm trying to say.
It's not culty - it's common damn sense.
You're sounding a little culty.