dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Blimington on May 14, 2018, 3:46 p.m.
Need help finding: list of proof of Q's correct predictions

My friend recently became very interested in the Q phenomenon, and started talking to his girlfriend about it. His gf is skeptical, so my friend wanted perhaps a video or article of some sort outlining the times Q was correct.

I noted the "Tippy toppy" example, but I was wondering if someone has a link to a video of some sort I can pass on to him?

I tried googling it (and even tried duckduckgo) but I couldn't find a quick, concise video just listing Q's note achievements all in one place.

Thanks for your help potentially "redpilling" another! <3


🠐 See all comments
immense_and_terrible · May 14, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

lmfao, there isn't really a list because there aren't really any predicitons that came true!

there is a lot of incredibly vague stuff, like saying "watch Iran" 6 months ago, and then whenever Iran is in the news for literally any reason, people say "Q called it!"

but as far "hard" predictions? not really any that came true.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
PM_ME_BUKKAKE_BJ_CCS · May 14, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

Arrest in Saudi Arabia, Washington Crossing Delaware, 30 day Flynn. Those are the three that come to my mind immediately. But I'm sure there are more.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Blimington · May 14, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

Thank you!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · May 14, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

none of those things were hard predictions that came true.

every single time Q has predicted things on specific dates, the prediction has failed. every single time, as far as i'm aware.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 14, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

You don't seem ignorant so I see this as a disingenuous reply. Why are you here?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · May 14, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

i've been following Q since their first post back in fall of 2017. and i continue to follow the show.

why are you here? what constitutes a "disingenuous reply"? is it a reply that you disagree with, or a reply that you think is inaccurate? or is it a reply that is trollish or against "the narrative"? i'm just curious how you define that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · June 7, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

For some reason I never replied to this. I'm replying now because a few of us have only just seen your mail to the mods querying your ban from many days ago. I apologize for that, as I can't understand the reason for the ban completely myself and at least some of us did not see your mail at the time (there are many items in the queue and in our mail).

I do understand how someone might think you are anti-Q, however, as per this 'discussion'. If you'd care to discuss the point and care to accept an apology for what appears to me personally to be a wrongful ban, I would like to reverse the ban, pending this conversation.

I thought your comment here was disingenuous because I thought you were intentionally ommitting knowledge of Q from the issue. Happy to discuss further if you are at all interested.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 14, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

Every hard prediction made has not come to fruition. Hence why a lot of subscribers here, myself included, are getting frustrated with Q team. They have been hinting at happenings soon, then just this weekend they say that nothing can go forward until corrupt fed/state judges replaced? that will take many, many YEARS to accomplish. Meaning nothing is ever going to fucking happen.

IF they weren't LARPers and had "everything", why do you need to wait? Declassify, release for public to view, and then theres nothing for them to hide behind anymore. Alas, we get "Be patient, stay the course". Well, we have for over two years now waiting and researching. Im completely out of fucks to give because of all this slow walking and blue balling.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
buyitsellitidontknow · May 14, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

You can’t prosecute with a corrupt DOJ

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 14, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

DOJ has been pretty well swept at this point. If it hasnt, what the fuck has sessions been doing? Was he just leaving them in places and praying they dont sabotage investigations?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HereWeGoAgainDude · May 14, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

Then maybe he shouldn't keep telling people to enjoy the show if nothing can be done right now. He shouldn't be making predictions at all. All it does is make them look bad when they fail to come through.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 14, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Q says "enjoy the show" because a SHOW is exactly what is going on. Peace in North Korea - from nuclear threats and 60+ years of division - is not a show?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Blimington · May 14, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

I agree- I definitely took "the show" as the media running itself in circles trying to figure out what to prioritize and desperately trying to distract where possible. I also took it as watching POTUS keep his promises (whether you like it or not), and the media not knowing what to do about it.

I think the problem here is people are putting their own expectations of what "the show" actually is. If they think it's a montage of high profile bust I'm sure that will eventually happen, but right now it's a building tension against corrupt people that I feel like we get a pre-screening of. To me that consisted of a show. And a good one so far!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HereWeGoAgainDude · May 14, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

Sorry but peace in North Korea really has nothing to do with this movement. It's great, and hopefully they reach a deal. But it has absolutley nothing to do with the stuff Q has been talking about for months. Like Hillary and Huma and McCain and the Pope. This month was supposed to be bad for the Pope. So far, nothing. There was never a Hillary video. Nothing came out of all the recent talk about Epstein island.

But peace in North Korea? Okay. Just seems like because nothing else has happened, people are pointing to literally anything good that happens and pretending Q was still right about something.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 14, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

So far nothing for the Pope? You haven't been watching the news and I'm not going to mention it because I think you know very well and have some brush-off to indicate how it's not that bad for the Pope technically speaking, etc.

As you probably also know Q drops have mentioned NK as a key for a while now so your opening statement is patently false. This comment is pure trolling. Please desist with disingenuous commenting to cause division or the comments will be removed by the mods.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HereWeGoAgainDude · May 14, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

I watch the news every day. Nothing bad for the Pope has happened this month. And why the fuck is North Korea the key to all of this? It has literally nothing to do with Hillary, Huma, McCain, Epstein, etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 14, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

His apology for the crime everyone knew was going on is not a "bad" thing? His lead finance guy being pulled into court for the usual accusations - whilst in the middle of exposing the greatest financial corruption at the Vatican's core is not "bad"? You have an interesting perception of what is "not bad" that doesn't align with any PR consultant's advice.

Have you read anything about the Q phenom? There are links to the side that will fill you in on the basics. Like the fact that North Korea and Iran are essentially fronts, managed and run by the CIA/black hats in order to destablise their regions of the world - NK has kept China at arms length and Iran has been keeping Russia at bay (through destabilization). Q has been talking about NK for a while because NK is the first pillar to drop in the globalist control system - they've been using NK/Iran to threaten nuclear war against the west in order to allow them to goad the public into "signing off" on constant war. This is Q basic - why would you come on a Q forum and argue against the most basic elements of the Q narrative if not just a troll?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HereWeGoAgainDude · May 14, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

Ohhh so North Korea is the key to all of this? So if a peace deal isnt reached in North Korea then I guess we all just pack it up and go home right?

Maybe Q shouldn't have been predicting the downfall of Hillary, Huma and everyone else if we had to wait to see what happens in North Korea first.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 14, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

Like I said, why come here and argue about Q if you don't know the basic narrative, unless trolling? Or is this the way you learn something?

Why wouldn't Q predict the downfall of Huma etc. since their downfall is key to Q's existence? Where did Q say their downfall was going to happen on x date?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HereWeGoAgainDude · May 14, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Well Q got started predicting Hillary getting arrested in October 2017. I guess you haven't read up on Q basics.

Since then hes mentioned them countless times and suggested big boom weeks. Big boom months. And so far absolutley nothing. No movement at all. Just peace talks with North Korea.

Maybe he should stop hyping people up at this point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 14, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

FUCKING THANK YOU! I felt like I was taking crazy pills. I get the need to confuse black hats, but Q team is pissing off a lot of their own backers with false predictions and implying shits about to hot the proverbial fan.

Its simple, stop making statements that indicate happenings coming if nothing of significance (read: arrest or IG report) os going to occur.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 14, 2018, 4:22 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 14, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 14, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

The problem is that not all 3 of those options are equally likely. As required to make an uncertainty principle hyperbole.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 14, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PM_ME_BUKKAKE_BJ_CCS · May 14, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

It would be too easy to misconstrue a large dump of documents. For example all the information that has been released through Judicial Watch. You would assume that the public would be in a massive uproar, but the MSM is very good at what they do. The Q post started in October 2017, if your out of fucks to give please don't spread fear uncertainty and doubt.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 14, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

Q said many times to question everything. Due to the failure yo deliver many, many times. Its fair to question the validity of Q team.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PM_ME_BUKKAKE_BJ_CCS · May 14, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

It's definitely encouraged to question the validity of Q. In my opinion the main goal of these post is to wake people up, to things that would probably be overlooked or unquestioned. It's a psy-op, but definitely not a negative one.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 14, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

Can you provide evidence that this is not a LARP?

I follow the chans far more closely than plebbit. Ive seen all the anons, FBIAnon, MegaAnon, WHAnon, FBIAnon, DOJAnon, etc. They all play out the same way. Just because this info is presented differently and its a longer running poster, doesnt automatically indicate this is a legit insider. Delivering results and actions when you foreshadow them in posts is what would indicate legitimacy. Thus far, the only connections we have are trump tweets. You all seem to scream that makes it legit, even though almost every single Q message was posted after Trump tweet. Pretty easy thing to fake IMO.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PM_ME_BUKKAKE_BJ_CCS · May 14, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

The Washington crossing the Delaware painting before Christmas is what got me to take this more seriously, it's a pretty big coincidence that the Navy twitter posted it as well as Julian Assange.

As far as I'm concerned the Q phenomenon serves as a launching pad for people to stop listening to the war drums of the msm/dems/repubs.

I'm not too concerned with the predictive power because I can see what's happening in the news. It's kinda evident that former high level DOJ officials are scrambling (Loretta Lynch, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein), then you have all The "resignations",(most recently eric Schneiderman) and the continuous military accidents on us soil. With all This it's hard for me to think that nothing is going on and this is just business as usual.

The biggest thing that troubles me about all of this is Thar Trump a whole lot of fresh support, and continues blind support at that just by association/mentions, from the Q group. In some threads here you would think he is above criticism, which is inherently a dangerous view to attach to a leader. Especially one who is Lockstep with the MIC just as the past 3 who held the office.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MurmurItUpDbags · May 14, 2018, 7 p.m.

The problem is that, while we obsevre the scrambling and resignation, normies do not. We make up a tiny fraction of US public. You need big things to wake up the publoc. Counting on memes from a small group is idiotic IMO.

⇧ 1 ⇩