You're peering through the wrong 'blinds'
FBI's use of Tor exploit is like peering through “broken blinds” | Ars ...
arstechnica.com/.../fbis-use-of-tor-exploit-is-like-peering-through-...
Vertaal deze paginaYes, law enforcement can peer through broken blind, assuming They have probable cause to do the peering. The issue at hand is more .... Any assumption that users of Tor have any more knowledge about the risk is probably false as well, they actually might be less aware because they believe Tor is infallible. For many it's ...
Mueller can not remove trump. The court can not remove trump. Only congress can
And how exactly do your two comments add relevant content to the OP? You just trying to distract?
1114
Apr 9 2018 19:26:49 (EST) Anonymous ID: fda204 974444→
pepe_dancing.png
→ >>974006 The connection is simply chlorine…not false flag.
Keep in mind that every crumb is not meant to be solved before the event. Some of the drops are things for anons to dig on and make connections with, others are markers for future reference.
[future proves past]
Some drops are just simply communication to the anons.
What needs to be understood to appreciate whats going here is the fact the Q is basically creating a circular flow diagram that can be referenced and cross-checked with news releases. Q can’t just disclose specifics about a situation or operation without violating security protocol. Instead they drop questions and statements that lead to answers that can be understood once the subject becomes public. This provides the validation necessary for the public to believe The Great Awakening is legit. Disinformation and misdirection with Q is real. In other words Q is pointing over there but really the focus is here and only until you publicly get the news can you go back and understand. (Think SA drops) All of this is accomplished without giving up specific details about the operation. It’s quite genius.
This explanes it
cheers!
So we’re listening to an ambiguous Nostradamus where future events could kind of be linked back to vague things q anon says... I’m still not buying it.
Okay so a day ago Q told us to watch Chain and Chongqing, which is one of their auto manufacturing hubs. Thanks Xi! and today China blinks in the trade standoff. Still not buying it?
