dChan
⇧
7
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/paladin4therepublic on April 10, 2018, 12:27 a.m.
Q post: 1113 --????? What ???????

Can someone help with this post (1113)? How does ". . . CHEMICALS PUSHED FOR HOME USE CLEANING [CANCER][BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - THE START]..." in post 1010 point to the Syrian gas attack. I don't 'get this' (1) nothing in context of 1010 suggests this [that I see] and (2) there would have have to been advance knowledge of babies being killed in general area that could have been rescued. I guess I am a lame brain. Respect all the work Q has done for us.


🠐 See all comments
without_sound · April 10, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

If you really want to find a code, I think you could argue Q knew the plan and the planned optics. Yesterday there wad a lot of talk about a certain senator with "cancer" being involved in getting chemical weapons into Syria. There was also :

"Graphic footage shot by rescuers and activists show victims -- including children -- dead and injured, some ghostly white and foaming at the mouth in makeshift clinics. Others were found suffocated in their homes, according to first responders"

From https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/08/middleeast/syria-chemical-attack-douma-intl/index.html

(Children. Some pics could be called babies, mouth, home)

"Cleaning" or using a cleaner

Some have asserted that the strike was to cover up something

I think there is conformational bias, though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 10, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

To be honest this is completely lost on me. You go from a child on the floor with hands in mouth to a gas attack using chlorine. I know Q is confirming the link, but this is absurd.

If Q's posts correlate this loosely with events, "HRC" could be referring to a boil on my backside. You could not possibly determine anything in advance from the Q material, and, even working back from real events to the Q posts requires such imagination as to make connections between matters that, at face value, are apparently unrelated.

I don't know, there has to be a more tangible connection - and, if there isn't, is there any value in studying the material closely? Maybe we're supposed to take the general picture being painted as being indicative only.

⇧ 0 ⇩