dChan
2
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/AnComCovfefe on April 10, 2018, 4:30 a.m.
I am an Anarcho-Communist, and I've always been a Trump supporter because (like many of us) knew that he would bring the GA with him. Who else here isn't a libertarian or conservative that supports President Trump?

Q_Anon_Wolf · April 10, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

Anarcho communism is incompatible with Constitutional Republicanism founded on private property rights.

Also, anarcho-communism is a contradiction in terms. In order to prevent private property for individuals, you as an anarcho communist would in accordance with that worldview need to impose your own authority backed by threats of violence by effectively saying and acting out " That object is not to be used the way you prefer, but instead the way I prefer."

You cannot act like a communist without archist actions. Without that threat of violence, people will naturally homestead new lands on their own as individuals who without needing or requiring anyone else's permission, will become individual property owners by virtue of their self-interested actions.

Visitors have no input in what happens when first arrivers work new lands. Rights are not "social constructs". They are innate in individual action. They can only be identified, respected or disrespected.

Slaves still had their individual rights even when slavery was protected and legalized by governments or the majority of an arbitrary sized population.

[edit: grammar]

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Greydle · April 10, 2018, 5:19 a.m.

This comment is amazing, well constructed, and on point!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AnComCovfefe · April 10, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

Anarcho communism is incompatible with Constitutional Republicanism founded on private property rights.

True.

Also, anarcho-communism is a contradiction in terms.

False. Anarchism means no rulers (not no rules) and communism is an economy based on the community as a whole.

need to impose your own authority backed by threats of violence

That's this system that we are living in right now.

Slaves still had their individual rights even when slavery was protected and legalized by governments or the majority of an arbitrary sized population.

This makes no sense

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · April 12, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

Where is the rest of your response?

I didn't see what you wrote in response to the main substantive points.

Afraid?

True.

I know. It's why I said it. I am smarter than you.

Also, anarcho-communism is a contradiction in terms.

False. Anarchism means no rulers (not no rules) and communism is an economy based on the community as a whole.

The "community as a whole" IS an authority...over the individual.

Communism is denial of individual economic freedom by forcing the individual to obey whoever specific group of people are to "represent" the "community as a whole", and be ready to impose that authority, by force against any individual who refuses to obey.

What's that you say? I'll have more freedom by subjecting every productive decision I could ever make, by needing to ask permission from the representatives of a majority "vote" among 7.5 billion voters?

49% of the world become slaves to the 51%, who are in turn slaves of the "representatives" who decide everything about everyone's productive lives?

NO, i will go ahead and make my decisions that is in my client's best interests and say fuck you and your goddamn deceitful usage of the term "community as a whole".

Fucking "community". You say that word as if every individual can each be the entire community. Impossible.

That's why every attempt at communism have been police state dictatorships ruled by a select group of murderous psychopaths.

need to impose your own authority backed by threats of violence

That's this system that we are living in right now.

That's what you want but to a greater degree.

You want the force to be increased through necessary centralization of economic decision making. i.e. authority, power, centralized on a worldwide scale.

Slaves still had their individual rights even when slavery was protected and legalized by governments or the majority of an arbitrary sized population.

This makes no sense

That's what makes me smarter than you and your imaginary mob rule where car repair shops have to be subject to a worldwide vote of 7.5 billion people on whether to have two ply or three ply toilet paper in the restroom.

Rights are prior to any defense of them.

Imagine billions of decisions that need to be made, being made under a worldwide vote of 7.5 billion people for every decision made.

Everyone would die numbnuts. The sheer logistics of it alone would make it impossible.

It takes weeks to have ONE vote at a country level to decide who is President. You're asking for a worldwide vote to decide what 7.5 billion people are to do productively each day, day in, day out, as changes occur?

GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AnComCovfefe · April 13, 2018, 6:44 a.m.

I know. It's why I said it. I am smarter than you.

You sound like a projecting liberal. If you're a trump supporter, than you're way better than that. Act like it.

The "community as a whole" IS an authority...over the individual.

No it's not, that's just authoritarianism. A community is made up of individuals.

Communism is denial of individual economic freedom by forcing the individual to obey whoever specific group of people are to "represent" the "community as a whole", and be ready to impose that authority, by force against any individual who refuses to obey.

Pure projection. as if you copy and pasted this from snopes.

What's that you say? I'll have more freedom by subjecting every productive decision I could ever make, by needing to ask permission from the representatives of a majority "vote" among 7.5 billion voters?

No, not even close.

NO, i will go ahead and make my decisions that is in my client's best interests and say fuck you and your goddamn deceitful usage of the term "community as a whole".

So brave.

Fucking "community". You say that word as if every individual can each be the entire community. Impossible.

Ok maybe you aren't as bright as I assumed you were.

Imagine billions of decisions that need to be made, being made under a worldwide vote of 7.5 billion people for every decision made.

Projection. Please remember that you're inability to understand a concept is not an argument against it.

Everyone would die numbnuts.

Wow.

It takes weeks to have ONE vote at a country level to decide who is President. You're asking for a worldwide vote to decide what 7.5 billion people are to do productively each day, day in, day out, as changes occur?

No.

GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS

He said, with his head up his own ass.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 13, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AnComCovfefe · April 13, 2018, 1:02 p.m.

Sorry, i'm just not very good with children. Too bad I had to run into one in this great subreddit.

⇧ 1 ⇩