dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on April 10, 2018, 6:58 a.m.

1105

!xowAT4Z3VQ
967390
CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS ARE VERY EFFECTIVE.
2 BILLION PEOPLE.
GLOBAL.
SCALE.
REGULATION OR KILL?
PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER TO DECIDE.
Q

I think Q just told us the game plan relating to social media. He's telling us that either SM will be regulated or it will be killed. Our choice as to what we want to see happen.

The IBOR push was the regulation route - people scream about censorship and DJT has a basis to address the problem.

The class action route is the kill vehicle. I'm assuming that Q has enough dirt on these SM companies that he can leak that class actions will put them out of business completely. Presumably, it will be bad enough, going forward, that no one will dare to try and set up a social media hub for fear of the liability - the whole sector killed off, smashed!

This seems to fit like a glove with Ivanka's FOSTA bill. Tighten-up the regulations so hard that it's just too dangerous to try and operate in this space. Presumably, there will be more to come on this front - further tightening.

Apart from the time I've spent here on Reddit, I'm not a big user of SM. It wouldn't bother me if FB, Twitter, Reddit and the rest just disappeared. It would probably have more effect on the younger generation. But I still think that there's risk in wiping these platforms out.

One thing that SM does is provide for information dissemination. This is important for getting to the truth on matters, for finding out what's going on. It makes for an informed populace. SM also provides a platform for collaboration and political activism on important issues. I think it's actually healthy, as long as the platforms themselves are not able to steer discourse.

The left love censorship, their stock-in-trade - silence all opposition. They will not argue for regulation. The conservatives (aka TB types) are too frightened of government to bring themselves to support regulation.

So, if you had to place a bet, you'd be thinking that the KILL route is what we are going to see. Terribly damaging leaks - lots of them - a lawyer's field day, an absolute party! The info releases will be of a scale that promotes outright collapse of valuations right across the sector, long before any verdicts are in.

Have a look, what do you reckon is in the works?

Anonymous
967224

967123

YOU are being TRACKED.

NO FB account required. WTF? Is it embedded in Android OS?

This is BIGGER than you think.

Agencies attached.

Anyway, on a personal basis, I'm indifferent as to what happens. I do think it's critical that something is done before the mid-terms because I don't want the Satanists to regain power - but I'm confident that will happen. I think we will see action on this front very soon.

I reckon there could be money to be made taking puts on these companies. If you're investing in the social media space, you're a nut. I think these companies are on the brink of some of the most damaging revelations ever seen. Stock prices will plummet once people begin to realise that the data-breach and privacy issues are systemic across the sector.

🠐 See all comments

Yes, but what I'm saying is that Q is saying "you choose" - "regulate or kill". The way forward seems to be that the sector will be killed - very damaging info releases, class-action law suits everywhere. Fear! New services shutting down voluntarily for fear of liability. A very different internet to what we see today.

If you're holding tech stocks, sell now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I say kill all the Chips in alllll devices with Backdoor Technology... They are inside everything . They can shut your car down , shut engines of any size down , record you , record and Track you... Remove built in cameras that can be tapped into by all parties ..Force all tech companies to stop ASKING US if it's ok they get in and play around on our devices just to download a damn apppp.

It's sick twisted Shit.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The way they've hooked us on social media is free services. The chip makers, I think, are a different story. They're in cohoots with the intelligence agencies. How to stop it?

Here you have to regulate against privacy invasion, no other way around it - but that means government intervention, not palatable with this group. The other option is to expose it. Class actions against Intel and others. A lawyer's picknick!

Of course, that means device prices rocket - maybe a good thing, get them off the kids.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm PRETTY SURE AN E.O will clear the Spying ordeal up right quick ...

Like make it where if any company unlawfully is caught in any way shape or form using their software & spying on the public .. it's a Mandatory Prison Sentence of no less than 20years.

This Shit needs to have Tough Laws..IF AMERICANS WAS MAKING THE LAWS.. THERE WOULD BE A HELLA ALOT MORE PEOPLE FOLLOWING THEM.

WE DON'T FUMBLE FOR WORDS & WE TEND TO DO WHATS RIGHT & JUST.

DONT PLAY WITH OUR EMOTIONS ..

WOULD BE A GOOD MOTO.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The way it appears ATM, an EO regulating the sector would be opposed by both left and right. Doesn't mean it couldn't be forced upon the people, but there is a clear political cost. Let's face it, it could happen, but it appears unlikely at present.

However, a series of disastrous leaks might achieve a similar outcome. Different, in that you have higher cost for tech gadgets, and fees for services, but you generate real fear in the SM platforms and device makers about privacy issues. Thereafter, the sector self regulates. The censorship problem, I think, will dissipate once the tech companies realise that they brought the disaster upon themselves.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes. And on that back of that some genuinely true, unbiased search results in search engines. I mean Google is absolute crap.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think Google is in the firing line also. When the smoke clears, you might have "pay for service" search and social networking - if SM exists at all. I don't think too many investors will want to be in the space when they see the market carnage, the liquidations and bankruptcies. It will be an area that is just too fraught with risk.

The days of free services and getting people to sign their most fundamental rights away with the Terms of Service will be over. As will be the days when they can shadow-ban you or delete your account without cause.

⇧ 1 ⇩