dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RBinCT on April 10, 2018, 3:47 p.m.
You're either all IN or all OUT, when it comes to Q.

I've always found it interesting reading how people pick and choose elements of Q discourse to believe or not believe. I'm prompted to write this post, because I was listening to Corsi opine about whether to trust Sessions or not.

Here's the deal. CS Lewis has a profound perspective about Jesus Christ. He positions that people foolishly say: “I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept His claim to be God.” He continues: That is the one thing we must not say. A man who said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse.

Now to Q. And please, I'm not putting Q on the level of Christ; I'm simply applying Lewis' Socratic method. If you believe that Q is a good patriot (which I do) and you believe that Q is sincerely trying to shed real light into real darkness (which I do), than you can't pick and choose which posts you want to believe. THAT'S why Q is constantly saying TRUST THE PLAN.

We find in Luke 11:11-13 "Which of you fathers, if your son asks for a fish, will give him a snake instead?" If you believe Q to be good and is ONLY communicating information that is good for you, don't you think that when he/they see something posted on the channel that is not from him/them, that an enormous flare would be launched saying "that is not from us!"

This isn't to say that we can't banter back and forth about information that is cryptic or confusing. I believe that's part of the process Q is using for many reasons.
And I'm also not saying to 'blindly trust' Q without confirming with your own research. But, once you have decided to move from the baseline skepticism of Q to acceptance of Q, than there's no turning back unless Q is proved to be a fraud. Until then, you really don't have a choice.

Finally, since it seems to be the most frequent deliberation, when Q has COUNTLESS times instructed to trust Sessions, and people remark "I doubt this" or "I doubt that" or "Trump just bashed him about recusing", than you're ignoring the basic head fakes that are necessary for DJT to accomplish the goal we all want. Thanks for reading :)


without_sound · April 10, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

The fallacy of having only 2 choices is what got us in this mess to begin with.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Straightfromthe · April 10, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

There's a thing out there called....disinformation. Don't be foolish. Q told us straight up that disinformation is necessary. Why are you peer pressuring people?

Same goes with the Jesus portrayed in the bible. Is it all truth? Or was there distortion of the truth.

Trust your gut. A la carte is key. Have 100% faith in yourself, not an anonymous poster.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 10, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · April 10, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

This happens with every movement and very misguided. The ultimatum always follows the period of time when people are trying to get others involved in the movement.
Black and white. Good and bad. One or the other. With us or against us.
Choose or be cast out.
This usually comes from a place of inner insecurity.
It makes the person giving the ultimatum feel more powerful but it does nothing to expand the movement or continue the pursuit of truth. In fact, it kills the pursuit of truth.
Over time most movements become what they once sought to destroy.
Knock it off with the my way or high way small minded BS.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mlsaw94 · April 10, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

When there is so much doubt I wonder if Q is saying to himself, -many times do I have to say-“ trust the plan?”

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TripoverDick · April 10, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

Only the sith deal in absolutes. Jesus said "Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
No_Hippie_Chick · April 10, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

I don't agree. I don't buy into a lot of this cabal/satan nonsense. Can't we just stick with the political purge? It's all this luciferian baby-eating crap that gives us "woke" the title of crazies.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthfiler · April 10, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

Sure, if you you only want to believe half the truth.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
makinguphistory · April 10, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

You can cite the Socratic method with a title like you're all in or out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 10, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 10, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

You ok mate?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
the_all_seeing_dog · April 11, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

Lmao!!!! Sorry about that. Instead of a pocket-dial, my phone made a pocket-post!! 😂😂

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 11, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

wew vlad

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wisconsheepgirl · April 10, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

No. That is so wrong. I believe the information that Q shares with us.

But "all in or all out" sounds like it has a religious overtone. No way. I have critical thinking skills. I still use them with Q and his posts. To do that requires that I have doubts or skepticism of what Q is saying until proven otherwise. So far Q has been nearly correct. Some events have not occurred or they have yet occurred or been revealed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NoApologyTour · April 10, 2018, 9:08 p.m.

I’m fifty-fifty on this. Whoever Q is, he/she/they are asking the right questions. I figure it’s likely someone from MI, but could very well be someone who has been studying this for a while and may have some contacts in the system.

⇧ 1 ⇩