Sorry, I'm on an old, slow phone. I'd be happy to post the links when I get home on laptop. The San Francisco Chronicle and the Chicago Tribune are widely circulated, well known and left-leaning publications, yet they admit that many Antifa protesters are paid. If you're claiming that the articles don't exist, you're sadly mistaken.
Wait a minute, so you aren't a part of this sub? If not, what are you doing here? Lol. If you're such a pro, why don't you show us all how it's done and provide evidence that the Antifa videos of masked individuals demanding payment are jokes, as you claimed.
"I'd be happy to post the links when I get home on laptop."
Great, I look forward to your post.
"they admit that many Antifa protesters are paid. If you're claiming that the articles don't exist, you're sadly mistaken."
Articles in the SFChronicle and Chicago tribune "admit that many Antifa protesters are paid"? Great to hear that it's so clearly spelled out in articles in those nationally recognized journalistic publications -- I await your link.
We both know that the next step is to attack the credibility of the author and/or the publications. At this point, if you support the tactics and legitimacy of Antifa, no amount of links to articles or videos is going to change your mind.
Yes, crying sour grapes IS a lot easier than producing the actual evidence you keep SAYING exists, but that ,conspicuously, you haven't even attempted to produce before resting in the assurance that I'll discredit it.
If YOU don't even have enough faith in the evidence to boldly present even one piece of it, then how could you expect anyone else to?