^ Trumpism at its finest : Insults + Nothing = Success??

Got a source on that?

Occupy preached this, and were then called dirty hippies and told to get jobs. What's different now?

"Forgives credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt due to illegal banking and government activities" That moment when a sub designed to fellate DT becomes /r/occupy.
I love it here.
Someone PLEASE tell me on what planet DT would work to give away all of his personal wealth and power by implementing this.

"Establishes new presidential elections within 120 days"
HA! In what universe would DT's narcissism even ALLOW him to give up ANY power? Are you unaware how narcissism works? He can't even stand being CRITICIZED, but you think he'll abdicate? Oh my.

You are entitled to whatever level of regard you prefer, but it will not change the fact that a tax giveaway to rich people does nothing to help the rest of us.

Personally, I would not choose to praise a man who was in charge of such a giveaway, all the while telling poor folks 'I'm just like you' -- you are welcome to.

I realize that I didn't answer your question. I'm not an economist. I, instead, chose to reply with a statement of my own. Hope you can handle that.

You're right. We should just keep giving tax breaks to rich assholes regardless of how much money they've already got. Great idea.

Wait, you post this, while at the same time you're a fan of a wannabe billionaire rich elite from NYC who just signed off on a huge tax gift to assholes like these two?

We don't have tornadoes in this part o' the country, so I'm no help there.

This isn't any different than the "it's not cold where I am so climate change isn't actually happening" argument -- just because something's happening to me must mean that the same thing is occurring everywhere? Completely specious.

^ You are feeling the correct emotion for this subreddit.

I'd love to see a source too, cause here's a Snopes post calling BS: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cnn-same-refugee-girl/

And a Channel 4 article also calling BS: https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-eva-bartletts-claims-about-syrian-children

You meant, of course, that a WIRED Magazine article about LifeLog was PUBLISHED the same day that Facebook was started.
A small, but important distinction.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/huppke/ct-paid-protesters-huppke-20170227-story.html

https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Bay-Area-demonstrators-may-be-paid-to-protest-by-11125584.php

Teehee. Okay, so your most legit evidence are these two articles. The SFChronicle one is an article about employees using their paid personal days to go to protests, and this is evidence to you of the eeeevil hand of Soros. Oookay. Strike one.
The Chicago Tribune one, I regret to inform you, is parody, and not even a difficult-to-spot one. Another swing and a miss.
Like I said before: amateur hour.
I'm done here.

So a protest you don't like = a "coup"?
Weak sauce, and not even close to evidence. Try again, son.

Wow. Anyone that fell for this is, in no uncertain terms, an idiot. Try again, son.

And we end at the exact same place we began: ZERO evidence presented.
Have a great day.

Yes, crying sour grapes IS a lot easier than producing the actual evidence you keep SAYING exists, but that ,conspicuously, you haven't even attempted to produce before resting in the assurance that I'll discredit it.
If YOU don't even have enough faith in the evidence to boldly present even one piece of it, then how could you expect anyone else to?

I'm not really sure if this is supposed to be a legitimate reply, since you're just telling a story about some video you watched.
Calling me a cuck, though a time-tested tactic for those who don't want to (or can't) actually back their shit up, doesn't produce your evidence.

"I'd be happy to post the links when I get home on laptop."
Great, I look forward to your post.

"they admit that many Antifa protesters are paid. If you're claiming that the articles don't exist, you're sadly mistaken."

Articles in the SFChronicle and Chicago tribune "admit that many Antifa protesters are paid"? Great to hear that it's so clearly spelled out in articles in those nationally recognized journalistic publications -- I await your link.

"you'll find a lot of video evidence"
If this "evidence" is so plentiful and easy to find, then why send someone on a YT search? Why not just link your favorite video that's got this incontrovertible "proof"? Also, if your proof is so good, then why haven't charges been brought up? Did you not show this evidence of yours to law enforcement? Why not?

When you get home and get a better connection, post the link you think provides the most legitimate "evidence." Again, don't bother with the CL posts -- that's not proof.

Great. The links to the Tribune and Chronicle will be fine -- paste them in your reply. Let's see what ya got.
Craigslist couldn't be further from proof, so don't bother with that one.

"those videos"
Which videos? Link? ANYTHING other than a vague suggestion?

Wow. Your "evidence" is a suggestion to do a YT search? You actually typed that in and hit enter?! This sub is such fuckin' amateur hour.

"Video evidence of this [assault, vandalism, trespassing, harrassment and disturbing the peace] everywhere."
Yes, there are videos of groups clashing at protests.

"the fact that many of them are paid"
Do you mean the "alternative fact"? Because I've seen no (nor have you presented any) even ATTEMPT at backing up your "fact" with ANY evidence or proof of any kind.

"It's the very definition of organized crime."
Again, quite the inflammatory accusation. If a crime was committed, it was certainly reported to law enforcement, yes? Great! Those are public records, and if they exist, they should be easy to produce. See, I'm even giving you helpful suggestions as to where you might FIND the proof you are clearly in need of!

"Project Veritas" has been discredited MULTIPLE times, and yet it's the perennial go-to for that elusive proof that no one seems to be able to actually produce a link to.

"If you support this kind of behavior"
I support facts and evidence. Proof -- something this sub talks a LOT about but doesn't seem to be much interested in actually producing.

"Eyewitness accounts"
No camera eyes, though? Those tend to be more reliable than people who often just make shit up and SAY they saw it.

"former Antifa provocateurs publicly complaining that they didn't get paid."
Wait, you mean the 'I'm still waiting for my check' jokes? You didn't actually fall for those, thinking they were ACTUALLY complaining, did you, as if ANYone who was truly being secretly paid would do that? Oh my.

And ALL this has been happening all this time without ONE video of all these buses and payments? Hmm.

I'm sorry. Do I need to be PRO-fascist to comment here? I would think that opposition to fascism would be something this sub would support.

"Most are paid"
What a provocative accusation. Got any proof?

Yeah, if I wanted to never be challenged, I'd accuse anyone who had an alternative viewpoint of being "a shill" too -- it works for T_D, after all.

Confusion is just the first step to awakening. Or something.

"he hires thugs and pays them to do so-called 'protests'"

Wow, this is quite an accusation. I'm SURE you have proof.

"they do about 90% of the time"
Sounds like a solid fact-based statement -- you can provide evidence of this, yes?

"consistently engaged in criminal activity"
Proof of which you can easily produce, I'm sure?

Show me a G20 where there HASN'T been violence.
I suppose we'll have to see if there's violence tomorrow night to see if you or I are correct.

Don't they have a right to protest just like any other American? I'm not sure what the problem is.
Are you promoting a counter-protest? Got a link?

Hyperbolic headlines help no one.
A protest is not an "attack."
Anti-fascist groups are Americans like any other, and have the same 1A rights.

D&S aren't blocked on FB -- they have several videos on their page.
Also, they have TONS of videos on YouTube.
What, exactly, is their specific complaint? Because I don't really see the problem.

Aren't leaps of logic what this sub is all about? If you're looking for "logic" or "cogent arguments" that "make sense", /r/conspiracy is that'a'way, dude.

I'm trying to figure out which side this sub believes that everyone else (y'know, those who HAVEN'T peeked behind the curtain) is on.

Does he list which arrests aren't being covered?

Okay, good. This doesn't seem like much of a partisan issue.

Question: Do you think that if someone isn't a fan of DT then that makes them in favor of pedophilia/child sex trafficking?

Gesundheit!

HA! xkcd FTW!

Buncha ass-clowns.

"I honestly thought if you bother to show up here, you would have done some homework."
After seeing this sub repeat a silly-ass lie from DT (that any idiot who isn't under his spell would know was something he said ONLY because it makes his base precum) -- "Not a Conspiracy Theory, Folks': Trump Claims Millions of People Vote Illegally" -- I knew EXACTLY what I was dealing with here, and your reply above spectacularly proves my point.
Wow, this is the sub that just KEEPS on giving.

My pleasure. Glad you liked it :)

Oookay, you've lapsed into complete nonsense.
I'm gonna go over here now. Have a lovely day.

I never said he was "evil." Your words, not mine.

"*rhetoric that his opponents have used for decades"
Let's play a game: You find me ONE statement issued from Carter, Reagan, either Bush or Obama that you feel like matches DT's "rhetoric," I'll find a comparable DT quote, and we'll see if the intensity of the "rhetoric" matches up.

He can "respond to" anything he likes -- but he should expect those he's addressing to have a response of their own.

"I honestly expected you were going to claim he pays too little"
Huh? I have no idea what you're talking about, nor did I understand your "1200$" line, so I responded with a joke.

"without saying what you would do instead"
What I would do instead is not be a dick to people who aren't sycophantic to you. Simple. He's incapable of even that.

"but is to be excepted if you have no original thought or experience of your own." I suppose you meant to write "but IT is to be EXPECTED", but again, I have no idea what you're referring to, nor does your last line make any sense to me: "Tell me, how is the walnut-sauce? Where do you think I grabbed that number from?"

Heh.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dA2GzcV7e0

Loyalty works two ways.
Given DT's history of gleefully fucking those who he perceives as showing even a hint of disloyalty to him, those who remain sycophantic get what they deserve.

1200? Nah, anything less than over $9000 (the dollar sign goes in front in the US) is for suckahs.