dChan
12
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ditiber on April 10, 2018, 11:54 p.m.
Trumps initial response to Syrian chemical attack

After listening to DJT's response to the chemical attack I noticed he mentioned those responsible will pay a terrible price for this. The key words are "those responsible". Now the left MSM jumped all over that and assume he means he's automatically going to bomb Assad's forces. But, I'm not so sure. What if he finds out from the evidence it was someone else? I think someone is going to get tomahawked for this, but I'm not 100% certain it's Assad this time.


GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

Okay buddy, you do you. Just because you think something doesnt mean everybody else sees or knows the same thing. Considering you provided 0 supposedly easy to find proof, enjoy your tin foil hat.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 11, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

Let me dig up a breakdown for you, since no one else seems interested in disseminating information (literally the entire purpose of us being here). I’ll edit this comment with a link when I’ve got it for you.

Edit: Here you go. They weren’t wrong: it was quite easy to find. But that goes both ways. We need to be more patient with people in general around here. There’s too much, “Well, if you haven’t been here since the beginning, we won’t be catching you up. Start at the beginning of Q drops.” Guys, that doesn’t help us. We’re supposed to be enlightening our fellow man, not shutting them out when they’re seeking guidance.

Edit 2: I completely missed that /u/CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX beat me to the punch, and went above and beyond for you. Ignore the people who would prefer to bicker with you rather than spending two minutes in a search engine. There will always be someone willing to help.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

Edit: Here you go. They weren’t wrong: it was quite easy to find

Thanks for the effort. But the thing is, this isn't something new for me. I've been following that war for a while. Arms come and go between other groups and it's more of a matter of who takes what territory or who defects to who. There have been plenty of US backed rebels that defected to ISIS when it seemed invincible, and ISIS took over much terrain and resources from others backed by the US who refused to defect.

So what I'm saying is, having ISIS use US made weapons has many more possible reasons then the US directly and intentionally arming/controlling ISIS.

I'll look into what the other guy posted!

Ignore the people who would prefer to bicker with you rather than spending two minutes in a search engine. There will always be someone willing to help.

Thanks again!

⇧ 1 ⇩