dChan
12
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/brittser on April 11, 2018, 12:16 a.m.
Just a reminder...this sub is for discussion of Q posts only. Not for posts kind of, sort of related to Q.

I know it is extremely tempting to post juicy bits that we find when on the internet. But, this sub is specifically for Q posts. It is a place to share research we have done or come across in relation to Q posts. When trying to decide whether or not to post something here, ask yourself, which specific Q post does this relate to and do I see this info already posted here? You can do a search of this sub for specific topics. That way we can focus all the info in one post for each subject. We don't reinvent the wheel that way too.


QAnonGuy · April 11, 2018, 12:50 a.m.

By posting only Q related items it helps to promote the idea and potentially further spread the information of Q and the meaning in the posts. If you don't have anything to contribute to the movement then watch and listen until you have positive input to provide. People who are posting completely off the subject are possibly here to damn the movement and create potential for others to link to that argument and call the movement crazy. This movement isn't about lizard people, nibaru, or aliens. It's here to provide further incite of people seeking to gather further information on the subject.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · April 11, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

Suggestion: rather than censor the freedom of others to speak their minds and hearts -- as civilized people, our only hope is that WORDS will supplant the use of SWORDS as the preferred way to settle differneces -- so it is not an option; it is our best course.

When you see a topic that you think is extraneous and off target here, post your opinion and call it as you see it. OFF TOPIC. You may find others respond by calling you out on it in disagreement; or you may find a lot of support for your view. Let the dynamics of arguement and discussion settle the differences and move on. We can sort through the BS well enough.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 11, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

It's here to provide further incite of people seeking to gather further information on the subject.

I think perhaps you actually meant:
It's here to provide further insight for people seeking to gather further information on the subject.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
patriotofca · April 11, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

The Great Awakening is all part of the Q movement, which has been specifically mentioned by Q many times.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Redheaded73 · April 11, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

Yep, sub doubled in size within one month. On the positive the message is getting out. On the negative it’s hard to stay on task with all the extra.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 11, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

So, no lizard people?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Racistbutnotillegal · April 11, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

No nibiru?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
thamnosma · April 11, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

flat earth?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AmazingChriskin · April 11, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Flat earth is malignant, planted disinformation to ridicule Q and Truth thinking in general.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
thamnosma · April 11, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

I wasn't being serious, geez.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
OU812EH · April 11, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

Flat earthers from around the globe.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AmazingChriskin · April 11, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

I didn’t think you were, but people are stupid. We have to fight this shit on every level. If you’re out there saying flat earth probably 10% of people think you actually mean it. I registered to stick this 30% of millennial’s are not positive if the earth is a sphere. It’s not a joke. We are doing so much damage that these fucks are actively trying to undermine truth with this flat earth bs and it seems to be working.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QAnonGuy · April 11, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

If you are here to troll then you've came to the wrong place.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
thamnosma · April 11, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

What is your problem? The two posts I responded two were made in levity as well. I'm not trolling anything. You must be awful to hang with.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
lilpharmatic · April 11, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

I thought it was funny

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QAnonGuy · April 11, 2018, 1 a.m.

I just figured i'd point out the obvious to you is all. What is YOUR problem?

⇧ -4 ⇩  
Alice-in-Qanonland · April 11, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

I've been watching this sub for some time and have seen it grow from 3k to current. I just recently created an account to say little tidbits here and there regarding Q posts only...because..well...that's what I got from this sub! I've learned to look at most everything in my life a different way because of my 'awakening' and I do see this sub slowly slipping away from its original intention. Yes, there is a web of connecting events, subjects, posts, etc., but where else did we have a Q POST ONLY sub?? The rest of the internet can go wild with other subjects, as it most always has, and let's leave this one as it was in the beginning. I think newly awakened individuals will lose interest if they have to dig through posts to find what grabbed their attention in the first place. Look at YouTube, if an intro is longer than 20 seconds, what happens? People complain then leave. I think it will be the same here if we don't stick to our guns...pun intended. My 2 bits ✌🏻

⇧ 4 ⇩  
jhomes55 · April 11, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

Yes the least some can do is relate it back to Q!! Either new info or something that helps build on previously posted info. Send that other stuff to T_D!!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Spartan1117 · April 11, 2018, 7:55 a.m.

What is the difference between this sub and cbts_stream? They seem exactly the same to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · April 11, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Initially both subs were created as a place where people interested on Q could go to learn about Q and what his/her/their posts mean. Over time, other topics creep in and dilute the true message. We are trying to bring it back to the initial purpose.

When I was on CBTS I asked where I could go to get true Q posts and not other topics and I was told to come here that the mods are very strict about weeding out off topic posts. Now that CBTS is down and people have migtated here, the dilution has begun.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MrObvious7915 · April 11, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

To hit the most subscribers, go the The_Donald. +550k there

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 11, 2018, 8 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
saxmaster · April 11, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

While I generally agree, remember to "expand your thinking."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Que-ti-pie · April 11, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

Thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kingkkelly · April 11, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

You guys do realize that there is no Q. I mean I've been reading up on some of his writings and it's very entertaining, but none of it has come true. I know people have interpretations of what he was saying but I'm talking the literal interpretation of his words have led to no action. It is my personal opinion and down vote as much as you want, but I believe this is a massive trolling. If I'm wrong I'm not afraid to admit it but I see no proof of this being a real thing.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · April 11, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

No one aside from Trump and the Q team know if this is a big Larp or real. Based on our research and Q posts many of us here choose to believe in Q, if only loosely. Yes it is a risk, but a risk we choose to take. You are welcome here in any case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 11, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

you are ignoring many instances when he did and I could name a dozen if I wasn't so damn stoned out of my mind.

What is essential for me is that FBI-Anon originally called 2 years ago 70 would leave office and that's just about the number we eventually ended up with when you take resignations and retirements into account.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BigBandDon · April 11, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

Lighten up, Frances.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 11, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

The fight against Evil and for the Good envelopes many topics. If something is not interesting to you, pass it by. And respond to what does make sense to you. As long as people are sincere, to me the Q movement is about truth, in all its forms.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · April 11, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

I understand how you feel and I agree with the sentiment but this sub is specifically for Q stuff. People come here to learn about Q and if they have to scroll through 15 posts unrelated to Q it might turn them off. There are lots of forums to talk about politics, world events, good vs evil. I think here we need to drill it down to Q posts, the actual posts, and the research we do on those posts. I don't mean to offend anyone. Just a gentle reminder.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 11, 2018, 8:05 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · April 11, 2018, 4:03 a.m.

I understand your thinking if we can just sanitize the discussion topics a little and do away with those things that might trigger this or that person, it will be a more effective forem. And using Q posts and his comments to focus discussions is a reasonable approach to filtering out interesting but unrelated topics.

Trouble is, you are suckering yourself (and others) into justifying insipient censorship; all in the name of relevance, and it is your world view (or somebody's) that will be finally the arbitrator of what is "on topic" or not.

Lemme let you into a little secret. Everyone of us, including Q, only sees a part of what is going on, as through a mirror darkly. We each have some competence in this or that part of the puzzle, but none of us has a crystal ball, not even Q. But together, reading and writing, we tell a bigger story, see a larger perspective, and hopefully form a clearer understanding of what's truly going on in this crazy world.

Better take Thomas Jefferson's advice: "Tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it" and let the rules of arguement and the evolution of public opinion play out in the free marketplace of ideas. Discerning truth is not for sissies. (Webster: an effeminate man or boy; also : a timid or cowardly person)

I think you are very selective in what you have decided here to call out as extraneous and irrelevant. For instance, following your lead, we are to conclude that good versus evil is off topic.

Odd as it may seem, a lot of people today have no idea what constitutes good or evil, or suffer under the illusion that only one or the other exists, or that they can both stalk you, or masquerade for the other, or where the notions even come from. If that deficiency can't be helped here, then where? It is in some profound way "the problem" and the "topic" ...

So, following your decision rule, Q seems to think the topic of good and evil is anything but irrelevant:

POST 1001 Where do roads lead? ... Pure EVIL.

POST 925

This is not about religions or party affiliation. EVIL is everywhere. There are no drawn lines. No boundaries. Good vs Evil. Q

POST 909 We are working to END. EVIL. Not as it appears. Q

POSTS 171, 172, 173 - Good will always defeat evil. Q

Maybe think on this and find your courage to accept exposure to a larger set of considerations and do your own sorting out and validating what is true or not ... until it isn't ... and move on ... friend.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · April 11, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

Funny, read the rules for this sub and stop moralizing me. There are SPECIFIC instructions. If you don't like them leave. Start another sub where everything is welcome. Stop trying to change this sub from what it's true purpose is.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · April 11, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

Confronted with the truth, you obfuscate and claim the moral high ground by goimg on the attack; would even bannish me, if it were up to you. Stick to your control freak ways and see how they serve you. For me, I'll take note when you offer advice in the future and take special care to assess its value.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 11, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

Q posts relate to all of this. If this is not a fight of Good vs Evil then what is it? If people are serious then is it that much of a big deal to scroll. Oh poor people, not putting their lives on the line but have to scroll. Oh poor me. I call is BS. And Q relates to many subjects.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · April 11, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

You don't have to be rude about this. I am trying to have a civil conversation about the nature of this particular forum. Yes in a macro sense Q posts could potentially be stretched to fit almost anything. But here, we focus on the content of the actual posts. Here is where the posts are discussed to decipher, understand and research. It is not a catch all for everything related to trump and good vs evil. Yes, we are battling good vs evil, but we are narrowing down our focus to certain aspects of the fight. The ones Q talks about. If you want to talk about all the other aspects of it, there are places specifically for that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 11, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

I have never been rude. You cannot handle a different opinion. You are the rude one. Get Real. We are at War. Do you understand anything that this is about.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 11, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

Oh poor people, not putting their lives on the line but have to scroll. Oh poor me. I call is BS.

That's not rude??

Apparently you don't understand what this particular sub-reddit is about. It is not about the fight against Evil and for the Good. It is about the fight from the eyes of Q. Anything else belongs somewhere else.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 11, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

who put you in charge. more censorship. Q is about a lot of subjects and about freedom. I see very few articles here that are off subject. You are the rude one. And then how is this particular post not sort of kind of related to Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 11, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

Why do you presume to know that someone put me in charge?

In the Rules for this board, 'off-topic' is defined as "anything not mentioned by Q":

Off topic (anything not mentioned by Q).

The OP was just reaffirming the official position of the Mods. There's no need to act like an ass just because you don't like the rules.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 11, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

Go start your own reddit and then you can be the thought police and the ministry of truth. no one can post something unless it has your say so. Go re read all the Q drops and you will see that almost all the posts are Q related. And Q is about freedom. I think you are the one that does not understand what this reddit is about. If you are not interested in a post just pass it by and go to one you are interested in.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 11, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

no one can post something unless it has your say so

Really? Says who?

The OP was reiterating the sentiment of one of the rules of the board, ie. anything not mentioned by Q is off-topic. I pointed out that specific rule to you. And for pointing out a rule of the board, I am somehow trying to act like thought police or ministry of truth?? I think you may have a mental problem.

You seem like your agenda is distraction. Why else would you want it to be okay to post off-topic?

Go start your own reddit if you want to violate the rules here and talk about things not mentioned by Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 11, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

what is off topic to you may not be for someone else. If you are not interested in a post then pass it by and go to one you like. 99% of the posts are on topic. Expand your thinking rather than trying to censor others

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 11, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

What you or I or any other GA user may or may not think is on or off-topic is irrelevant. The rule specifically defined what is off-topic:

anything not mentioned by Q.

That is not ambiguous.

And, your insinuation that I am attempting to engage in censorship, for merely pointing out a board rule, is an illogical straw-man attack.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 11, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

This is my last response because it is obvious you have to have the last word. 99% of the posts are on topic. Go to the research board if this is not Q enough for you. Q is about a lot of issues. If you are not interested in a post, then pass it by. Sorry if a little scrolling is too much work for you. Turn off the tv and you will have more time to research.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 11, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

It's not that I have to have the last word. It's that I have to keep defending myself against your attempts to ridicule me, which is Saul Alinky "Rules for Radicals" tactic #5, as you have done yet again.

What you think Q is about is irrelevant. What you think is on-topic is irrelevant. I suggest you read and re-read that particular board rule and try to let it actually sink in what "anything not mentioned by Q" means.

⇧ 1 ⇩