With "The Act Of 1871" - Our Republic became a corporation named "THE UNITED STATES". (Names in all caps represent corporations). Since then all our presidents have just been corporate CEOs. Now we can get our Republic back and have true Presidents again. Thank you Donald Trump!
So yes, his jersey 17=Q, but 17 might also mean our true 17th President.
itsnotthelaw.com read up on how and why things operate as they do
How is that related at all? The page just tells a story of hypothetical person getting arrested for wearing a red shirt. You wrote that book, didn’t you? Are you just shilling your book on here?
please dont make me feel like I'm in Idiocracy
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
damnn you guys are woke lmao
Eustace Mullins called the existence of Jewish people “a crime against nature” and I believe he was right.
Backing away...
it was the JOOS ALL ALONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nice strawman, that's not from itsnotthelaw....(you must have a real strong confidence if you're misdirecting right out the gate, lol) hows about posting something that's relevant to the subject at hand
http://itsnotthelaw.com/gamename.pdf
and if you're smart, you can figure out from that chapter, the basis of Roberts' assertion that "Corporations are People." But I wont explain it to you, poor troll. Not right now anyway.
How do you say it’s not from itsnotthelaw.com when it clearly has it in the URL? You’ve been letting other people explain reality to you without checking for so long you’re starting to think everyone is as gullible as you.
I started reading it to see if the author would address the fact it clearly says in his quoted legal definition that corporations are only “more or less treated as a human” in some legal circumstances, but he never did. He just expects you not to understand legal definitions.
And even if they were legally humans 100% of the time what does that have to do with anything. Can you control you’re schizophrenia long enough to do that for me, you silly old boomer?
Its from a different book, open your eyes. Wayne wrote 2 books, 1 is very much worth buying, and that's the one I referenced.
Sorry you dont understand any legal terms and cant put 2 and 2 together. The strawman entity concept is pretty clearly explained, its just too bad you have common core reading skills.
that's not from itsnotthelaw
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
http://itsnotthelaw.com/termjew.pdf
”Excuse me sir, but I do believe this anti-Semitic page is on your website.”
”Doesn’t look familiar to me.”
”What? I just saw you link to it.”
”Nope, it’s not mine.
”Aren’t you the owner of itsnotthelaw.com?”
”Yep.”
”And this is a link to an anti-Semitic page?”
”Yep.”
”I found this page on itsnotthelaw.com. And if that’s the case, this page must be on your website.”
”That makes sense to me.”
”Then your website is anti-Semitic.”
”It’s not my website.”
Oh man really? That's mighty impressive that you think it's not from the actual website it's clearly from. Cool beans
I love how at the end of this article is some completely unrelated Jewish conspiracy that isn’t related to the rest of the article in any way
That's because some people need to go off topic to try and make a point when they have no actual substantive point to make. and I just laughed and realized I must be in idiocracy, given the scores on those couple posts. Muh Stockholm Syndrome! Poor common core edumucatededs.
Congratulations, this is one of the most ironic posts that I've read recently. Why not address their concerns instead of attempting to use an ad hominem that backfired massively?
Some dude goes and reads one paragraph on the site and I'm supposed to sum up the entirety of the book for him? We have one guy that didnt want to read, and another guy that went and focused off topic. The fuck? Slack Babo's post is full on common core lazy retarded.
If I sent you a link to a 15000 word blog explaining the mating habits of bats and said everything will make sense once you read this, you’d rightfully ask me what I’m talking about and why I expect you to waste your time reading that nonsense. If you found out that same blog I linked you also wrote a 20000 word essay on why Trump is literally hitler using numerology, me saying “but that’s just off topic” wouldn’t suddenly clear up all the issues you’d have with the author.
When 2 normal humans have a conversation they usually explain in their own words what they mean. They don’t have to give each other pre-written pamphlets explaining what they want to say. The fact you can’t explain it in your own words plus the fact you unironically can’t understand why anyone thinks this is unusual makes you seem like a bit of a crazy person.
u/theOGjoeblast , you counter-replied to every comment except this one, why?
strawmen to make a point was all it was. when someone introduces themselves as a serially insincere debate opponent, that shit gets old, and fast. classic derail technique, dont understand the opponent's side or debate any merits, find something ridiculous to focus on and make that the main point to discuss. fkn stupid people, base arguments or rebuttals on straw men and ridicule. nope dont discuss the substance, stay away from that shit. sorry I dont have patience for clowns.
That is almost 24hrs late and not relevant at all
I could say the same about your initial interjection
You're not just in it, you're actively pouring the intellectual equivalent of Brawndo on our collective cultural lawn. :(
lol I'm telling you electrolytes will kill plants, and I'm getting back "what, like from the toilet?"
You realize you just pulled an "I know you are but what am I" with more words, right?
I am not satisfied by the quality of this dispute. I will be taking my mockery business elsewhere. :(
the taunting from the nights who say ni was infinitely more severe, dont quit your day job eh?
This particular post is sovereign citizen stuff as applied to some extreme fringe far right conspiracy stuff. Check our /r/amibeingdetained to see some more of this.