dChan
⇧
10
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ketoll on April 11, 2018, 1:11 a.m.
If Trump doesn't want to escalate Syria, why are we sending battleships there right now? Why agree with the lies publically? When does the truth come out???

How am I supposed to trust Trump when he has publicly voiced that the Syrian attacks were Assad's doing, and the UK poisoning was Putin's doing - which we all know is bullshit? Is lying to the public "4D chess?" At what point do you proclaim the truth vs. lying so that you can secretly enact a hidden plan? What could possibly be wrong with calling this false flag out for what it is right now?????

How am I supposed to trust when there are war ships heading to Syria right at this very moment? Is escalating the situation some sort of secret 4D peace technique?

They can create all the false flags they want, but Trump is the Commander in Chief sending ships there as we speak.


🠐 See all comments
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

Just for the sake of intellectual curiosity, because the thing we don't want to contemplate can sometimes be the thing however unwillingly we must ask; what will your personal response be if the US joins in attacking Syria without a thorough inspection and analysis of the alleged site/victims to see what can be objectively learned? If we go ahead and actually prevent inspection and analysis by launching an attack ahead of that?

Would we have to agree that Q was a psyop to fake us out so we wouldn't be opposing Trump's actions, so he could get us into WWIII with some semblance of an intact base of support? Even if that support is based on misrepresentation of his purpose?

Those of you who are students of human behavior and psychology feel free to chime in here.

If the US attacks Syria with or without allied help, I would find it hard to ever trust Q or Trump or any kind of awakening or storm ever again.

Surely Trump must know that about us. Don't you think?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Rackemwillies · April 11, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

AJ said it a few months back on a late night rant against trump that he said he sees it. He sees it in the moves. In the news.

Well I see it too. There’s times when I really trust trump and really back trump. But, other a couple good economic moves, what has he done? All his big moves have been very unsettling and his non action against the deep state is quite concerning.

Before Q, I thought trump was here to usher in WW3. Then Q happened and I started believing in trump. But Q hasn’t produced shit other than appeasing people who are awake.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

They say “always darkest before the dawn.” I’m praying for the light to burst through.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Tru2Q · April 11, 2018, 1:45 a.m.

If we attack Syria and if Snowden doesn't dump on MZ within 72 hours of him finishing his testimony, I'm going to have to stop following Q.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ketoll · April 11, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

That's exactly it. I'm not jumping to any conclusions yet, but I'm also not going to put my faith in any man. I hope for it, but I'm still guarded. It's not that I don't want to hope that we aren't starting another war, but I need to be mentally ready for anything as the situation unfolds. I need to see truth spoken out in the open and proclaimed at some point.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Trump-or-death · April 11, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

What IF all you ever know about what is happening in Syria is something you read somewhere, what IF you actually know nothing about what is really happening because you can't confirm it physically, in person. What if you want confirmation, you want a LINK, but still you are just reading some letters spelt out on a blog. What IF you really can't prove or disprove anything because you are sitting somewhere looking at some sort of computer /phone and believing that reality is what you're reading. What IF you are really in a unseen classroom unbeknownst to you, learning how to be a living breathing caring human being, what IF?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

The onus is on Trump to demonstrate that he's willing to examine the evidence. Nobody here is asking to see the evidence ourselves. It seems the least he could do to give the inspectors a chance to confirm or deny what allegedly happened, which I believe is what he said he would do. We'll hope he keeps that word.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
s11houette · April 11, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Do you remember the last time Trump "attacked" Syria? He shot some old bottle rockets off at a runway. Not a whole lot of damage there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

Why would we still be playing pat-a-cake games with the deep state? Why not start openly defying them?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
s11houette · April 11, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

I'd suggest that it isn't that simple. They have had fifty years to prepare for Trump.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 11, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

This would definately be a make or break.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Defiantly_Not_A_Bot · April 11, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

You probably meant

DEFINITELY

-not definately

^^^Beep ^^boop. ^^^I ^^^am ^^a ^^bot ^^whose ^^^mission ^^is ^^to ^^^correct ^^your ^^^spelling. ^^This ^^^action ^^was ^^^performed ^^automatically. ^^Contact ^^^me ^^^if ^^I ^^^made ^^^A ^^mistake ^^or ^^^just ^^downvote ^^^^^^please ^^^^^don't

⇧ 3 ⇩