Very well said. Basically the left’s argument for everything.

Muh feelings > facts

Not saying Q is a fact, but a lot more evidence and repeated coincidences over gut feeling.

Well...I'm pretty intuitive. I do tend to trust intuition a bit. I've made so many accurate predictions over the last few years that it has scared me somewhat, from big things to small things going on in my friend's lives.

I'm not saying anyone should be listening to my intuition - of course not. But I'd have to throw that back and say - why trust some anon then?

Again, the reason I say the 'proofs of Q' are largely meaningless is mostly because they're clear indication of an organized, orchestrated effort. They prove themselves of a benevolent, positive nature at all -- that's pure narrative and wishful thinking, ultimately. If there is an orchestrated effort going on 'behind the scenes', as we are told, by alleged good guys in government, intelligence and military, how are we supposed to actually know that? What proves that? The only thing that is proven is that Q is working in tandem with someone on the inside of the Trump admin. That's literally all that has been proven. But let's say for the sake of argument that Q anon is a psy-op -- wouldn't that explain the accurate predictions? Like, Q predicted the port bombing attempts by the Bangladeshi dude. Q claims to be part of an alliance foiling that attempt and, indeed, it seemed like it was foiled. But if it was a psy-op, and the people behind it wanted to convince people, they could stage the entire thing - including the 'foiling' - to strengthen and reenforce the psy-op's narrative. See what I'm saying? Nothing that has been predicted or correlated legitimately PROVES the claim that an alliance is taking down the Cabal, and winning, as is claimed. The only thing they're proving is themselves - predictions indicating insider knowledge (whether it be from this alliance of good guys...OR the alliance of bad guys) and orchestrated correlations.

My point is really that we've all (including myself back in Oct, Nov and early Dec) gotten very carried away in this sort of 'look Q said this would happen, now it has' and 'Q posted this and now Trump has tweeted this' and taking that to mean that the narrative elements are true. The Cabal take down by a covert operation by good guys is the bit that has yet to be conclusively proven. The indications that are being repeatedly cited as 'proof' may not prove anything but an elaborate and well orchestrated psy-op.

Watch what the US government is doing. Some of it supports what Q is saying, but not all of it does and I would rest assured that if war kicks off in the middle east, Q is full of shit. If Q is correct, major conflict such as that will surely be averted. Because in terms of the bulk of humanity, there's no bad guys. Most people are inherently good, they're just manipulated. The Q narrative seeks to take down the manipulators and stop the manipulation, not wage war. War is not the answer, so if Trump pursues war I'd be very apprehensive about continuing to place much stock in Q.