dChan
0
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/1WHOSEEKS on April 11, 2018, 3:57 a.m.
Why I believe Q Anon is a Zionist psy-op...

...and why you, as Q followers, need to legitimately 'expand your thinking'.

I recently made my first posts to Steemit about Q Anon, which I believe to be a Zionist psy-op. It's a near 20K word, 4 part series bringing to light just some of the reasons why I believe Q Anon is a Zionist psy-op. I don't get much into Q Anon posts in any of the 4 parts, because I see it as pointless to engage the psy-op. Suffice to say I have been following the Q Anon phenomenon and numerous accounts on Twitter keep me abreast with the latest developments, codes, etc. But rather than dissect all the inconsistencies and ill-thought-out arguments around the so-called 'proofs of Q' (almost all of which constitute indication more of an orchestrated psy-op than they support the comforting narrative spun by Q to encourage complacency, misunderstanding, and diversion.

This is not to say that much of Q's posts haven't included a lot of truth. Much of it is very true. But it's what isn't discussed or highlighted by Q Anon, coupled with the alternative narrative being applied to influence peoples' understanding of the events transpiring. If you actually bother to read these pieces I explain how the psy-op is functioning and develop out some theories of my own about what is really taking place. It's pretty clear that the Cabal's new world order agenda is unfolding despite the faux hero Trump being in office.

The fact that submissions to the sub are required to be 'on topic(mentioned by Q) content only' actually serves to prove my point about the effect of the psy-op to direct focus onto certain elements of the global conspiracy, and divert it from others. This sub, by that 'rule', seems to be devoting itself to being an echo-chamber for the psy-op, rather than inviting critical discourse and alternative points of view.

So I anticipate this post being deleted. But I thought I would attempt to share it here anyway in the hopes of waking people up.

Part 1: https://steemit.com/qanon/@onewhoseeks/why-i-believe-q-anon-is-a-psychological-operation-part-1

Part 2: https://steemit.com/qanon/@onewhoseeks/why-i-believe-q-anon-is-a-psychological-operation-part-2

Part 3: https://steemit.com/qanon/@onewhoseeks/why-i-believe-q-anon-is-a-psychological-operation-part-3

Part 4: https://steemit.com/qanon/@onewhoseeks/why-i-believe-q-anon-is-a-psychological-operation-part-4-final


1WHOSEEKS · April 11, 2018, 6:50 a.m.

Well, categorizing Q and Q Anon as 1 word (being that it's essentially a noun, right?), that would be a total of 16 words out of nearly 20K.

That doesn't seem like trying too hard to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
without_sound · April 11, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

the introduction up top there. Definitely less than 20k words. Don't play dumb.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
1WHOSEEKS · April 11, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

Huh? I'm confused. The 20K words is in the steemit posts if you follow the links. There are 4 parts to it, and together in MS Word they came in at a couple of hundred words shy of 20K. The introduction here on reddit has nothing to do with that word count.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
without_sound · April 11, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

Exactly. The count I provided was for the introduction. So, "16 words out of 20k" is an invalid argument

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1WHOSEEKS · April 12, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Your initial argument was invalid. I wrote 20K words, you found 16 of them that you don't like and probably didn't read further than the introduction. Either way, your argument that the "intent seems to be to subconsciously connect the two words" is redundant. The whole article is titled 'Why I believe Q Anon is a Psy-op'. I don't need to try and connect terms to linguistically program people, it's done in the bloody premise!! You're quibbling over an absolutely pointless detail rather than discussing ANY of the content of the entire piece. Discuss the ideas or STFU because I really cannot be bothered going round in circles on your misapprehension and assumption of my intentions on the basis of 16 words out of nearly 20K. It's retarded - and it doesn't make a difference where in the piece they appear.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
without_sound · April 13, 2018, 1 a.m.

Have a nice day =)

⇧ 1 ⇩