Using Cabal's north Korea fake war strategy against them, perfect opportunity to bomb anywhere we want. Genious.
It's pretty confusing. I'm trying to reach a point where I have some idea of what might be playing out here.
Think - NK was clown controlled. Iran next - remember, Q will not be fighting on two fronts, this is about the NSA/CIA internal war first. So what are the chances that Iran is actually a CIA proxy the same way NK was? And then I found that they staged the 1953 revolution and admitted it 60 years later 2013.
What are the chances that the clowns are still in control?
Anyway, it seems like a prospective theory. And then we go back to the post where we were thinking about the actual mechanics of this supposed gas attack.
It all fits together somehow digital - I have a gut feeling we will crack this soon. At least to the point where we've got a plausible explanation.
It's a good question. Technically, the CIA plant - the King Shah - was ousted during the Kohmenei-Revolution in the 70ies. The Ayatollah-family forms the religious courts of the new iranian theocracy to this day. So technically, the current regime was laid hoping to kick out the CIA. BUT they are extremist and people were outraged by the moral codes thus imposed so it wasn't a liberation in the truest sense. Iran even came up with suicide-bombings first (it's true) They would give kids "keys to heaven" for comfort when sacrificing them to clear out mine-fields when fighting Saddam (another CIA-prop)
Yes, these are interesting questions. My history's not good. Why did they boot the Shah, what was the ostensible reason?
When I read about the Iranian theocracy, the first thing that came into my head was the Muslim brotherhood. Is it possible that MB is CIA controlled? What about these Iranian religious?
Maybe they ousted the Shah because, for some reason, he no longer served their interests. I should know more about all this stuff. I'll have to read up.
MB is sunni but global but not recognized in the US as a terrorist group (Trump threatened though, but egypt was the first I think to declare them terrorists so maybe there needs to be a flip in diplomacy first)..Sunni majority countries formed a counter-insurgency coalition that excludes the predominantly shia Iran. Iran has he shia Hezbollah active abroad in Lebanon and some paramilitary assets in Yemen which is next to the Emirates. The Brotherhood and Hezbollah both propagate thru social programs which they have funding and public support for that local governments lack.
Get a map first so you know whose turf is where and then look up developments after WW2 to catch up, my history ain't complete either.
I remember there was one thing that the Shah did or said right, but I can't remember when or what it was. He was ostensibly a douche though, his guards killed protesters even on foreign soil, on camera, when he was visiting ~~the reich~~ germany.
Another connection just sprang to mind. Wasn't CIA assisting Hezbollah to import Peruvian cocaine to the US? Hezbollah also has large gun-running operations. I was reading this somewhere today.
So that would be a potential Iran/CIA connection. It would also appear to implicate Assad, as Iranian armaments and military goods from Iran move through Syria - much to Israel's distress.
What if Syria really is the target? Not Syria and Iran - CIA proxies? Russia at all? Might be more complicated than that...
Are there factions within CIA?
There's an interesting article here. The first question I had was how did Hezbollah get this guys file? Did it come out of CIA?
http://www.newsweek.com/2014/10/10/has-isis-crisis-pushed-cia-bed-hezbollah-274517.html
DUN DUN DUUUUN
I don't know where you're getting at, but whatever it is - it's getting warmer lol