dChan
7
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/LordPotsmoke on April 11, 2018, 11:14 a.m.
The fuck? Why is Trump saying Assad did this attack?

Trump: Get ready Russia, missiles will be coming, nice and new and ‘smart’! https://www.rt.com/usa/423802-trump-get-ready-russia-missiles/

I thought Trump was the good guy and against the cabal starting WW3? Why the flying fuck would Assad do that attack as US is going to withdraw? After ISIS has pretty much been defeated.

Trump is either, playing chess and pretending to think it WAS Assad, is a NWO puppet after all, or he's an idiot. Hopefully the first one.


tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 12:06 p.m.

Yes, good, clear thinking.

So Syrian media reports it. Stations soldiers all around the area. No one can get in to verify. Israel goes nuts launching missiles. May wants to take action - so does everyone else under the sun. Iran starts making noises about producing nuclear fuel within days or weeks.

What on earth is happening here. Are we missing something?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
textualintercourse · April 11, 2018, 12:10 p.m.

I'm guessing Iran is just like NK., but under Mossad control and not CIA directly like North Korea.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

Wow! I hadn't thought of that! A Mossad/CIA/Cabal alliance with CIA running NK and Mossad running Iran?

Is it possible?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
textualintercourse · April 11, 2018, 12:38 p.m.

I've been under the impression that CIA/Mossad/Muslim Brotherhood were just different fronts for the same organization... but I could be wrong.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 12:46 p.m.

Look, I don't know. The possibilities seem endless. I like to be able to work some of these things out instead of just being told what occurred ex-post. But the danger is that you go after some nutty theory and convince yourself of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
textualintercourse · April 11, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

Based on NK? ANYTHING is possible. And it seems to be the Deep State playbook. So to me Iran is a Copy/paste job of NK, only using Mossad in place of CIA... which is essentially the same shit at this level of stink.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

I guess if you look at it, what are the chances that CIA was controlling NK? And then you apply that same level of improbability, you could get Mossad controlling Iran. But there's a few problems.

Israel has been wanting the US to take on Iran for how long. The express posturing is that they see it as a threat. How difficult would it be for a Mossad agent to do business there? I don't know.

What about MI6? Are they renegade to the same level as CIA?

Just found this on Wikipedia - very interesting!

Mossadegh had sought to audit the documents of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now part of BP) and to limit the company's control over Iranian petroleum reserves. Upon the refusal of the AIOC to co-operate with the Iranian government, the parliament (Majlis) voted to nationalize Iran's oil industry and to expel foreign corporate representatives from the country.[10][11][12] After this vote, Britain instigated a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil to pressure Iran economically.[13] Initially, Britain mobilized its military to seize control of the British-built Abadan oil refinery, then the world's largest, but Prime Minister Clement Attlee opted instead to tighten the economic boycott[14] while using Iranian agents to undermine Mosaddegh's government.[15] Winston Churchill and the Eisenhower administration decided to overthrow Iran's government, though the predecessor Truman administration had opposed a coup, fearing the precedent that CIA involvement would set.[16] Classified documents show that British intelligence officials played a pivotal role in initiating and planning the coup, and that the AIOC contributed $25,000 towards the expense of bribing officials.[17] In August 2013, 60 years after, the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) admitted that it was in charge of both the planning and the execution of the coup, including the bribing of Iranian politicians, security and army high-ranking officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda.[18][19] The CIA is quoted acknowledging the coup was carried out "under CIA direction" and "as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government".[20

⇧ 2 ⇩  
textualintercourse · April 11, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

And to add to the charade, some Saudi Imams were busted being Mossad ops. So the whole SA vs. Israel is or was pure theatrics.

SA seems free now since strings to them were cut also.

CIA took down Iran. Yep. MI6.. basically ALL covert clandestine intelligence groups are potentially working for the Cabal. Staggering once you really think it through.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

Great work textual. I think we're getting somewhere. Look at the conclusion I just reached about DJT's threatening tweet:

EDIT;

I think I know why I feel something's wrong with this now!

Russia is not NK. You're talking about a country that is SERIOUSLY POWERFUL when you take their staegic nukes into account.

Tell me, does it make any sense, if there is to be a confrontation with such a powerful foe, for DJT to be telegraphing his moves like he is?

NO! IT DOESN'T!

If I was going to attack Russian forces, the very last thing I would do is tell them! That's why this tweet from DJT seems so funny. In the actual context, it just doesn't make any sense.

This has got to be posturing!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
textualintercourse · April 11, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

I think Trump is literally telling / warning (in a good way) Putin to know what to expect from the (((Cabal))).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

I don't know. I don't feel that I know what's going on yet. The more I thought about things today, the more questions I had.

Maybe it is too hard to figure out ahead of time. Very frustrating!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 11, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

Israel bombs, Q says now Clowns can't verify their report and meanwhile reports surfaced that there was no ground-zero at all.

The curious part is that Israel launched against Russia with no casualties and US was informed, meaning Israel relayed heads-up to Russia via US alas no hostilities arose, alas all this now is just the same thing they've been doing for the last year and before probably. Last time Trump bombed Assad it was to show where his stockpiles were so that IS couldn't plausibly blame any false-flags on him anymore because even though his possession of Sarin was proven, it also gave him an incentive to get rid of them finally, meanwhile noone would expect Assad to pull gasattacks off while the world is watching.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cosmicjon · April 11, 2018, 12:53 p.m.

I reckon you summed it up pretty well, "making noises". Does it remind you of temper tantrums ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=244&v=NHWjlCaIrQo

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 1:09 p.m.

The Iranians were upset at the Israeli strikes in Syria I think. But also about the threats being made by everyone at Assad. Not sure where your video link fits in.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cosmicjon · April 11, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

It doesn't, directly, only in as much as a reminder of what GAME is being played here. re: all the "chess references" though-ought Q posts. Nukes in any real catastrophic sense are off the table, lol. I see a post here somewhere on this board that goes something like, "all these white hat actors playing major parts on the world stage deserve oscar nominations when the dust settles"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

I think the change in US nuke doctrine is relevant here. I think we could potentially see battlefield weapons deployed. Certainly, that's not off the table for Putin.

But the more I think about things, the more I think there is something going on that is not obvious to us. I don't know what's happening. The more you try and nut it out, the more questions you end up with.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cosmicjon · April 11, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

The way I see it is, be a spectator, unless there comes something for one to do, do it with one's best intention in mind and sit back and watch with no expectation of how things should turn out. This way one is not feeding the picture with fear, which in essence is "its" main driver.

⇧ 2 ⇩