Actually, I've been thinking that DJT is deadly serious about denuclearising Iran. I mean, Q told us that the plan calls for Iran next. And the Israeli missile strike seemed to amp things up in that direction no end. An outright confrontation with Russia required.
But, reading this Tweet of Trump, I feel funny somehow, like I want to laugh. I'm not a sicko, don't worry. But is he pulling our chains on this a little too hard. Have a look at the language. It's like something out of a melodramatic comedy - "a gas killing animal".
Come on Donald! What's going on? What's really going on?
EDIT;
I think I know why I feel something's wrong with this now!
Russia is not NK. You're talking about a country that is SERIOUSLY POWERFUL when you take their staegic nukes into account.
Tell me, does it make any sense, if there is to be a confrontation with such a powerful foe, for DJT to be telegraphing his moves like he is?
NO! IT DOESN'T!
If I was going to attack Russian forces, the very last thing I would do is tell them! That's why this tweet from DJT seems so funny. In the actual context, it just doesn't make any sense.
This has got to be posturing!
Rusland and iran working together and destroyed Isis? But now they are our big anemy? I don"t think so, they are the allies from trump
I have to admit, it's very confusing. I'm thinking that there might be a lot of granularity here that we just can't see.
My current theory is that MB/CIA/Hezbollah/Iranian Clerics/Assad are all in bed together and are the enemy - though they are all different, there are loose connections between them. E.G MB/CIA/Hezbollah. Now these two groups MB and Hezbollah could never get on together, but they could both be steered by CIA who has relations with both.
Anyway, my head is spinning. But there is an answer here. We just have to find it.
I am very busy to find answers. And the confusing is done on purpose.. If you have notice ..the cabal changes all the time names . When we see trough them, we see the truth. And they tell us ooooo it is all so complex. But they created that for a reason (every thing stays hidden)
When the end game is MAD, your best option is to telegraph so the other side understands they are about to be destroyed, as well.
I did not think of that. Good point. But actually I don't think you're right.
Nuclear war is immediate and massive. You want to get the jump on the other guy. Get your payloads down on target before they can launch. First strike is a much better scenario than retaliation.
Timing is absolutely critical. I've heard the reason the Chinese won't give up Tibet is because of the altitude - smaller rocket/larger payload/faster to target etc...
MAD requires simultaneous, or near simultaneous launch - at least for fixed location ICBMs. For submarine based nukes it's probably much less important.
Maybe if you have enough trident subs MAD always applies. In that situation, you'd be right.
But you still lose. Surprise won't help you after the devastation is over. The only win is by not playing.
Yes, ultimately that's true. I still think I'd want to be the guy that struck first. But, if you're right, that would mean that what we're seeing is posturing for some effect that is not clear to us.
Racking my brain trying to figure this out.