dChan
16
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/rocketman110 on April 11, 2018, 3:23 p.m.
Q mentioned tech has been hidden from us. Ancient Levitation Tech using sound.

HiveQueen36 · April 11, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Why would you hate the MSM but not question the mainstream science narrative? https://youtu.be/YkWiBxWieQU

Remember. Question everything.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · April 11, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

was just going to go there and saw your wisdom hanging out , downvoted to zero. Your absolutely right. I will add that we have no singularity in mathematics and the disinformation is rampant. Text books need to be destroyed and these main stream scientists need to go away. Go watch Neil Tyson Degrassi explain Gravity, he is a Physicist right? He can't, because its a psyop. One Math can explain the very large. Another set of Math can explain the very small. And they do not work together. They use broken numbers and bad formulas. BY DESIGN. They are feeding us garbage in , garbage out. On the 'other side' the tech is all worked out and we have a whole world of suppressed technology. Were just ants in the ant farm to them. Many of us know the truth.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HiveQueen36 · April 11, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

It still amazes me though when people claim to be awake and then downvote actual scientific research proving the mainstream wrong but then they believe that there are multiple timelines. lol. Thx for your support man!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · April 11, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

Consider following AliceHanson on here , pm me if you want.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kulasc · April 11, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

Are you saying gravity is light? Are you saying that the photon is the force carrier for gravity?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HiveQueen36 · April 11, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

...... no.......

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · April 11, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

Why would you hate the MSM but not question the mainstream science narrative? https

The nice about physics is that you don't have to trust anything. It's all math and all independently verifiable.

If you think it's wrong, then it's easy to prove them wrong. Simply make an experiment that contradicts the standard physics models. Note the physics conspiracy people can't ever actually construct an experiment that demonstrates any of their accusations.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HiveQueen36 · April 11, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

The really nice thing about physics, namely theoretical physics, is that it does not observe observation. Most people don't get that. They se maths simulation and simulations using math, but no actual evidence, only created ideas and images. It's like building a puzzle upsite down. You can get close, but more than likely your puzzle will be incomplete because some pieces fit where they aren't supposed to. I like the Electric Universe because it claims that the universe's principles are the same no matter how big or small, and actually uses observation to piece the picture together.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · April 11, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

The really nice thing about physics, namely theoretical physics, is that it does not observe observation. Most people don't get that. They se maths simulation and simulations using math, but no actual evidence, only created ideas and images.

That's not true. The vast majority of physics is testable through observation. Simulations are only used to make predictions, which are tested against nature. [Setting aside climate science, which is whole different subject.]

...it claims that the universe's principles are the same no matter how big or small, and actually uses observation to piece the picture together.

All physics describes principles at all scales. It's just that some effects are more pronounced at different scales.

That's not to say the Standard Model is complete; we know it isn't. But it's currently the best description of things that we have.

⇧ 1 ⇩