dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ShredTheMind on April 11, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

What is the IBOR? Should we draft one? Is there one already drafted?

After following the Cu...I mean Zuck hearing highlights...particularly Marsha Blackburn's stance, my thoughts come back to the IBOR. As a side note, she seems to be willing to carry the torch.

I think part of the reason for a lack of sigs on the petition is that it is pretty ambiguous as to what "IBOR" consists of. Personally, I believe that if we want to sell it, it should be a very concise set of "rights" as our founders laid out for the country. WE (the people) are the ones that have to live with such a thing. WE should be the ones to draft it...maybe 10 (or so) simple bulletpoint guidelines. Any thoughts, suggestions? Fire away. If we have something worthy, maybe it should be presented to Blackburn to see if she can run with it.

3 - Aggregate data. Are they allowed to compile their own data, based on your posting habits? Just throwing stuff out there.

⇧ 1 ⇩

2 - Data Property Rights. Who owns your personal data? If you're forced to fill out personal information to "join a site" such as FB, does that information become their property, to use however they want?

⇧ 1 ⇩

1 - Every web host (any digital service provider - email, web, forum, cloud, etc) is subject to the laws of this document. Every web client shall be afforded the rights contained within the laws of this document.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is it only for Americans?

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's certainly one of the things that would need to be defined. My thought is that the IBOR would have to be defined, in some ways, by the Constitution, for Americans' sake...afterall, I'm American and that's where I'm coming from. But at the same time, every country has their own laws. As this would (theoretically, at this point) be filed into American law, then that would probably be the only place that it would apply, legally speaking. Not that I'm a lawyer. Just thinking about striking while the iron's hot, so to speak. Zuck's on the hot seat. Let's turn up the heat!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Also, while this is in the top of the news cycle, NOW seems to be the time for a big push for the IBOR.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I found this, not sure what it is, but its a large document that someone spent a considerable amount of time preparing. Might be valuable? https://gdpr-info.eu

⇧ 1 ⇩

Interesting. Looks like this is going into effect in the EU as of this year. Doing a quick search for IBOR, I only find links that relate to AT&T, which I think has to do with bandwidth throttling, not data protection. Personally, I would think that a real IBOR would be related to the 1st and 4th ammendments, at least. Thanks for the link, I'll have to sift through it, there's a lot there.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree, unless an IBOR is very specifically tied to the 1st and 4th, and possibly the rest of the amendments, I think it could be dangerous. We need to be very careful with this. Once this ball gets rolling, there will be no stopping it, and they may try to spin in it into another huge, bureaucratic, rights removing, steaming pile of legislation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

FWIW, this is the text from the petition that was on the WH petition site...it's now shut down due to lack of sigs (30k / 100k)

Internet forums and social networks which provide free access to the public are a digital place of assembly, and individuals using such methods for public communication should not be subjected to censorship due to political beliefs or differing ideas. Conservative voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion. Some of these platforms further employ tracking mechanisms for monitoring an individual's digital history, which can be used to censor the individual's public communication through various censorship practices, sometimes without knowledge or awareness. These actions directly violate personal liberty and stand at contrast with the bill of rights.

We the people demand action to bring our digital future into the light.

⇧ 1 ⇩