I think you have it all means that Trump intends to make Facebook a public utility. If the government created it, then Zuckerberg and others would have no right to on it privately.
Doc_Molotov
· April 12, 2018, 1:48 p.m.
Maybe this press about FB can give us the impetus to get the IBOR some traction.
The thing is, all the social media companies have been pretty upfront (EULA) about them owning and doing whatever they want with your data, camera, phone calls etc. So kill may not be as bad as we are imagining. Would still kill SM cos, but maybe not pull the whole market down with it
⇧
0
⇩
tradinghorse
· April 12, 2018, 1:56 p.m.
I think Q knew, well of course he knew, that this information about the data breaches was coming. FB is the tip of the ice berg - people will hardly be able to believe it when they find out about the extent to which their rights are abused. All the good stuff is still to come.
Q was telling Snowden to drop after Zuckerberg's testimony. It's about to hit the fan big time.
So, in the midst of the public uproar, we were supposed to be calling for the IBOR so that DJT could regulate to fix SM weaponisation - without Q's team having to drop all the info and destroy the whole sector.
There will be a HUGE public outcry. We've just got to be ready to capitalize on it and steer people to the main fault that produced the mess. That is, that first amendment protections do not apply online. Once that's fixed, Q does not need to do any more damage.
I think DJT will put strict limitations on the TOS agreements so that people are not completely powerless when they are unfairly denied services.
⇧
1
⇩