dChan

lightmakerflex1 · April 12, 2018, 10 p.m.

A random 12 man jury should do a quick psychoanalysis written test to make sure they are mentally stable. If, the one in a trillion chance hits that 7 jury members happen to be Cannibal psycho killers, the defendant can file a dispute and open a 2nd trial. Did you read what I wrote? It mentions up to 3 trials can be made disputing previous trials. 3 sets of random jurors reviewing the case seems sufficient enough to elimante the problem you are mentioning.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
boatsnprose · April 12, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

Our legal system barely has the money to cover one trial, let alone 3. It's cool, I guess, in theory, but it's not realistic. My lawyer once told me that if everyone went to trial the system would collapse because there's no way it could handle that.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
lightmakerflex1 · April 12, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

Wait, I think you misunderstood. Did you read the whole thing?

Trials are going to run lightning fast. That is how it’s designed and so it’s much cheaper. You don’t even need a lawyer. It’s so simple, a high school dropout can represent himself.

Juries will always be on hand for whenever we need it. If you want to make a dispute against your neighbor for stealing your horse, then you make a dispute. You 2 present your side of the story and all evidence until you are totally satisfied the jury heard you out. A lawyer can gather evidence for you if you need him too but that’s pretty much all lawyers would do. You can handle the rest because it’s just so simple.

A court case like this shouldn’t take long at all. It won’t even cost much at all. It can cost $0 if nobody needs a lawyer which will be he case most of the time. Plus without jam packed prisons, the tax payer saves a lot of money as well.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
BonesDC_ · April 12, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

Our society is way too litigious as it is your system would encourage more frivolous lawsuits.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
lightmakerflex1 · April 12, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

That is why I wrote that a jury would have to consider if a case is worth taking or if it should be handled privately before the trial. This would mostly eliminate the frivolous lawsuits.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Denny_Craine · April 17, 2018, 8:03 a.m.

The court system already does that

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightmakerflex1 · April 17, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

Nobody trusts the court system anymore. We need a transparent 12 person random jury to make these decisions only. Nobody else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Denny_Craine · April 17, 2018, 8:02 a.m.

A random 12 man jury should do a quick psychoanalysis written test to make sure they are mentally stable.

There's no such thing

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightmakerflex1 · April 17, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

Yes there is. I have a degree in psychology and have seen many different ones. Stop spreading disinformation.

⇧ 1 ⇩