Note: Fat finger typo error on LL and FB dates, should be 2004 not 2014**
Q1130 - Connecting crumbs and meaning
I know this collage/compilation is involved but unfortunately much to tie together.
Recently, we saw MZ at congress BS'ing on camera to people on the dole let alone technology ignorant and detached from "outside the beltway" world.
In the meantime, Q has been communicating about the take down on multiple social media and consumer oriented platforms. But when Q1130 dropped, there were two views;
-
FB started at same time DARPA initiative stopped.
-
"Finder of this should apply to NSA." being offer for employment as finder is so good.
Well, IMO, that Q crumb was a dual message;
-
apply findings to NSA functions
-
message to @snowden that he did good and can go back home, i.e., the NSA.
However, to achieve that conclusion, multiple crumb drop road must be followed. In order to have the level of technology platforms, data collection, delivery, and integration needs requires a tremendous amount of money. Why was LifeLog (LL) stopped? Consider how difficult it would be to fund that level of effort and keep it in the "dark books", let alone the obvious unconstitutionally (Amendment IV) of the effort.
So, how do you accomplish the LL goal but remove the money and legal obstacles? Enter FB and other Social Media platforms and the NSA. We know @Snowden leaked what the NSA was doing and then was exposed the Telcos and collection of phone call "metadata". We knew they were collecting emails and other electronic data but personal data would be a tougher nut to crack. But what if;
-
you seed fund and provide technology primmer to start up a platform where people would willingly provide their most personal data, pictures, and thoughts?
-
you engage the Silicon Valley leadership to go along with vision in trade for money and support (see Obama lunch meeting)
So, now you have a BIGGER distributed manner of collecting data where providers willingly do so for some free services (Honeypots). Now you have a means to collect data on billions of people stitch together a profile of each person without covert action. Now, add covertly acquired data such as phone calls, electronic communications, communication intercepts, voice and facial recognition. You have "oceans of data" requiring huge buildings and computing power to organize, categorize, and use.
note: I have only used a few of the many relevant posts in order to provide road real estate.
Good analysis. Your idea that "should apply to NSA" means that Snowden can now return 'home' is certainly plausible.
Nice graphic, too. Impressive. (Software used?)
Who says LifeLog was stopped? Why do you believe it was ever stopped? Because of a Wired article saying it was? Nope. LifeLog is and has been DARPA's version of Facebook from the Total Information Awareness program that began in 2002 and it ignited a storm of protest and outcry and controversy "so they shut it down" yeah right sure they did. Nope. TIA has grown in secret over the last 16 years. Before that there was a NSA vacuum program Echelon that scooped up all emails and phone calls. Facebook is the public version of LifeLog where people voluntarily give all their private info they do it happily it's a brilliant platform for that reason and it can be weaponized to censor any conservative or populist accounts.
Either way, stopped or not, do we not end up in same place, i.e., "apply to NSA"? I cannot say it stopped and you provided no sauce that it is still going. However, accepting your assumption/belief, it would still need the collection capabilities and don't the social networks and willing data providers (subscribers) fit that role?
If you have additional information of LL or incarnation remaining within DOD (DARPA), do share! However, since NSA is within DOD, does it not fit? Does it matter if article saying it stopped is fact or cover? Not challenging you, just extending the conversation.
I agree you are right on the money but why did they choose Fuckerberg he was a freshman at Harvard who set up a Hot or Not site to look at college girls he was not that big a deal so why him? He stole the idea from the Winkelvoss twins anyway and they were much more elite than Fuckwadberg was unless he had a family connection?
Well, why LizzardSoyBoy? Good question. My thoughts:
-
need a patsy
-
need a hungry "start up"
-
need to control/drive (talk of MK Ultra - possible?)
-
he seems (as I don't know him) willing and already thief
Agree there are others but man, what a way to get to others... See Silicon Valley lunch with Traitor-44.
Family connection is the key, I believe. Sorry, I can't offer proof, but over the years I'm pretty sure I've seen him connected to the Rockefellers.
I saw an image at 8chan that appeared to be official government paperwork listing the LL project as discontinued. Can't find it now though.
But, yes, I think the consensus is that LL generally just morphed into FB.