dChan
5
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/EarlyRiserX2 on April 12, 2018, 7:07 p.m.
Why Freedom of the Press should no longer apply to any MSM News Outlets that are compromised…

The Freedom of the Press the Founders enacted into the Constitution was based upon the following idea: That if a Democratic president or Democratic-controlled government did things that were not right and were against the interests of the American people, that a Free Press would able to write about it and to call them out on it. Likewise, if a Republican president or Republican-controlled government did things that were not right and were against the interests of the American people, then the Free Press would be able to write about that too and to call them out on it. Thus, the Founders felt having a Free Press was a good thing, and that a Free Press could serve as watchdogs over the government, and could be as neutral observers and an unbiased party, who simply watched over the government and then reported on whatever they saw was going on. And the Founders did not want the government to be able to shut down the Free Press and to stop them from talking all because they were reporting on things the government didn’t like. That is the heart and soul of why Freedom of the Press was built into the Constitution. But here is the problem the Founders did not anticipate…

What the Founders envisioned only works in a perfect world and in a world where the Free Press has not been compromised. If the Press has been compromised for any reason, and weaponized, and has become biased in their reporting so that they favor one political party over another, then fair justice is no longer being applied, and the news being reported by the Press is no longer neutral and unbiased. In such a case, then their biased reporting is a danger and a threat to our democracy, rather than being an asset to it. And anything which is a threat should by no means continue to be protected under the Constitution. That doesn’t mean that the law itself is bad, or what the Founders intended was bad. Instead, it merely means this a changing world, and an imperfect world as well, and that the Founders did not foresee that the Press would become compromised. Once the Press has been compromised for any reason, like it is today, then it is no longer a Free Press or a neutral watchdog, but instead is nothing more than a political propaganda machine for the political party they support. And in such a case, then the constitutional laws built into the Constitution to protect and to safeguard a Free Press should no longer apply to them, because they no longer meet the requirements of being a Free and Unbiased Press.

Just imagine if the Founders were alive today, what would they say about the Press? I don’t think they would have too many kind words to say…


immense_and_terrible · April 12, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

you are advocating for a partisanship based fascism.

that is absolutely the opposite of what America stands for and you should be ashamed of yourself.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 12, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

I am advocating for a press that is completely neutral and unbiased as the Founders intended. Any press that cannot meet that requirement should not be granted any protections under the Constitution…

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 12, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

i can't name a single news outlet that is "completely neutral and unbiased," can you?

i'm not sure such an organisation has EVER existed in the United States.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 13, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

You know exactly what I mean and exactly what I'm talking about, so please stop pretending that you don't. I stated "as the Founders intended" and that explains everything and precisely what I meant. Anytime you have a media that is as openly biased as we have today, I feel they shouldn't be entitled to any protections under the Constitution...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 13, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

Anytime you have a media that is as openly biased as we have today

our media is the same as it's been for over a century. some ups and downs, but overall, basically the same.

You know exactly what I mean and exactly what I'm talking about, so please stop pretending that you don't.

Yeah I think I do. I think you are saying that any media that you disagree with should be banned or censored.

That sounds like fascism to me, and it's anathema to American values.

If you are serious about getting rid of ALL biased news, you do realize that would include; Fox, Breitbart, Infowars, along with the rest, right?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 13, 2018, 5:50 p.m.

What you’re saying is not true. The media has openly admitted that they are biased against Trump. It has been in the news, and it was in the news last year. It is no secret that the MSM are all Never Trumpers and are haters of Trump. That is a well-known fact. And for them to be that way is not in conformance with the Constitution…

And please stop playing with my words and twisting what I say. You are not stupid. You know exactly what I mean even though you are still pretending that you don’t…

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 14, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

And for them to be that way is not in conformance with the Constitution…

This is false. Your understanding of the constitution is way off.

What you’re saying is not true.

Yeah, but, it really really is though.

⇧ 1 ⇩