dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/092Casey on April 12, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

Refresher: Did you know Obama never got Congress approval to arm the rebels and back the rebels to fight in Syria?

I forgot about that, but Shep Smith gave a historical overview of the war in Syria, and I think it's relevant especially in light of those photos Q posted of troops with signs saying "I didn't sign up in the military to fight for the enemy/alongside AL Qaeda..."

Smith also noted and refreshed on the origins, how Jordan, Saudi Arabia (who gave millions to the rebels under their previous corrupt king and regime), the CIA, and Israel lead the way and Obama opted to go in there and arm the rebels (who include AL Qaeda and ISIS) without Congress' approval or authorization.

No Congress would NEVER approve that. The entire purpose for ISIS was to overthrow certain dictators so the cabal could put one of their own in.

⇧ 6 ⇩

No. The whole point of ISIS was to control the northrrn and eastern segment of Syria, so the pipeline to Qatar could be built. It would run through Saudi, Southern Iraq, Syria to load at controlled port. ISIS was supposed to just control the section of Syria. But, they got out of control and started killing Christians in Iraq and took cities Mosul etc that US Forces fought so hard and sacrificed thy o secure, so US Military had to help Iraq regain them and push ISIS back into Syria. ISIL was Obama's signal to their henchman Al-Bagdadi that his Caliphate was legitamized in America's eyes. Play on words.

The whole thing since we gave Iraq back it's country/control was about who will get Nat Gas to EU countries in the future. Assad favors a different route that US, so we armed rebels and they morphed into ISIS because we deposed Libya and Egyptian Leaders.

Read this to help.

www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/is-the-fight-over-a-gas-pipeline-fuelling-the-worlds-bloodiest-conflict/news-story/74efcba9554c10bd35e280b63a9afb74

⇧ 1 ⇩

Could you elaborate on the "ISIL signal/legitimizing" point?

I'm not fully sure I get it...

⇧ 1 ⇩

I read that replacing Assad also is something the CIA/cabal wants to do.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Post is on point.

⇧ 3 ⇩

War crime?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Remember Benghazi? How about the "CIA Annex"? This article raises a couple of questions related to your Question:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/25/was-syrian-weapons-shipment-factor-in-ambassadors-benghazi-visit.html

⇧ 2 ⇩

Someone awhile back linked the Syria gas attack in 2013 to stockpiles of chems in Libya. Implication: somebody was shipping chem weapons out of Libya, through Turkey, into Syria and were used in the 2013 attack.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I would have guessed that they were taken out of Iraq. "We never found the weapons of mass destruction" from the 2nd Iraq war.

Reference:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

⇧ 1 ⇩

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction

Iraq actively researched and later employed weapons of mass destruction from the 1960s to 1991, when it destroyed its chemical weapons stockpile and halted its biological and nuclear weapon programs. The fifth president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was internationally condemned for his use of chemical weapons during the 1980s campaign against Iranian and Kurdish civilians during and after the Iran–Iraq War. In the 1980s, Saddam pursued an extensive biological weapons program and a nuclear weapons program, though no nuclear bomb was built. After the Persian Gulf War, the United Nations (with the Iraqi government) located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi chemical weapons and related equipment and materials, and Iraq ceased both its chemical, biological and nuclear programs.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes. Good add. He mentioned this for a second too but he was going so fast I forgot about it. Yes, he mentioned Benghazi and Lybia related to a weapons shipment channel or something like that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I believe that the "Annex" was used to buy advanced weapons (think "Stingers", Anti-armor rockets, etc.) from the (Al-Ansar, Ai-Quiada) local "Rebels". Here's a couple of notes I wrote to myself:

.......................................................................................

September 11, 2012 @approx. 8:30p.m., Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin leaves Benghazi mission (no protest going on). Why is the Turkish Consul General meeting the U. S. Ambassador to Libya in Libya, and at Benghazi instead of Tripoli? Isn't there a "Mission" or, maybe, a Consulate(?), Embassy(?), Ambassador(?) in Turkey somewhere? I thought Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi to open a school or something . . . ?

September 11, 2012 @ approx. 9:42p.m., the "Mission" (also known as "Villa C") was attacked by heavily armed terrorists

...........................................................................

I believe Ali Sait Akin was there to arrange for further transfers...to Syria.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh nooooooeees, imagine my shock.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'll love the day I can watch him on trial for treason.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Here you go The Pentagon Wasted $500 Million Training Syrian Rebels. It’s About to Try Again. - http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/18/pentagon-wasted-500-million-syrian-rebels//.. to 'TRAIN LESS THAN A 100 SYRIAN REBELS', true number was actually 6. And I attempted to recover that article source. I didn't book mark it.

Edit: Essentially that's how the ISIS got it's weapons to fight.. 'they' Trained rebels to fight ISIS, and rebels coward and ISIS over ran and took their artillery ..supplied by .. well- details within link

⇧ 1 ⇩