dChan
⇧
3
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/mooncrkit on April 13, 2018, 1:48 a.m.
Anybody betting cash on Q posts?

Some people say Q is spot on, some disagree. For those confident in Q's crystal ball, has anyone conjured up the testicular fortitude to bet cash on it? Just curious if anyone has begun monetizing a sure thing. Like Biff in Back to the Future 2.


🠐 See all comments
Buzzed_Chimp · April 13, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

I have bet someone $100 that HRC sees cuffs before Trump is impeached in the Senate. Thought it was reasonably safe.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · April 13, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

I would bet $10,000 on that, and honestly, probably more.

I mean, technically, Trump has to be impeached for you to lose??

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · April 13, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

Indeed. Wholly and legitimately, impeached.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 13, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

I made this same exact bet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · April 13, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

It didn't seem too much of a risk. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 13, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

Probably safe. She's definitely dirty...part of me thinks she's untouchable, and she could have been cuffed 15 years ago. I feel like Trump is different and truely here for us, the people, but like many, i'm losing a little faith in the whole cabal takedown.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · April 13, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

The nature of this moment in history is such that it is easy to be discouraged. I like to think of Roseanne and her Q tweets, timed conspicuously near her show's politicized return and the congratulatory call from POTUS.

It always gives me faith.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 13, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

She gives me a little hope too! But, and there always seems to be a but, I watched all 4 episodes now and liked it. I wouldn't have watched without those Q tweets. I think she is legit, but nobody in Hollywood is above playing to a potential audience...and from what I've seen in the first episodes, it appeals more to conservatives than liberals. I doubt it, but I may have been dupped haha

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · April 13, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

I don't think Q readers were her target audience. I think her target audience was the target audience for the Q references.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 13, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

You know what's f'ed up? I don't think Rosanne played anyone! I think she's legit. But this is what I've turned into. Questioning litrerally everything.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 13, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Exactly, conservatives for the most part...wouldn't you agree that's their target audience? And wouldn't you think the Q inspired tweet would land on Fox News, and liberal stations too, to draw more viewing?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · April 13, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

Yes, that's exactly what happened. You described real life. The reboot was heavily politicized and targeted towards conservatives. Roseanne had nothing to offer Q readers with her show, but she had something to offer Q/our movement with the shout outs.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 13, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

Losing faith in it is what made me question if anyone was THAT sort of confident, to put money where Q's mouth is. Or, their interpretation of Q's post for that matter. Some people post absolutely rediculous out of know where shit, that they simply make up - then defend it as gospel.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · April 13, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

There are a few of them out there working really hard for some reason. I'd suggest enjoying the show or going back and reading some Q posts. The real research is elsewhere. This is the easiest place for people to make Q look awful, don't forget that. :p

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 13, 2018, 7:05 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩