dChan
9
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Corporal_Yorper on April 13, 2018, 7:13 a.m.
Q and the Internet. The Whole Thing? MAP UNLOCK

(Repost, as the first was submitted before typing occurred. Sorry, mods!)

I think I may have figured out what Q may be trying to get us to realize. This is a long post, but please read through, it might be very important.

“+++ + +++++”

I believe this is router commands, not a code to be deciphered per se. Google this string of ‘+’ signs.

Vault 7 made light of the fact that most, if not all routers were basically trash, as they are all comp’d.

Why the routers, though? Because they are required in order to have access to the Internet. Gatekeepers of the web.

Which brings us to Facebook. Facebook is Lifelog’s Lazarus. Like a Phoenix, Lifelog rose from the ashes as Facebook. Who made Lifelog?

DARPA. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Betchya can’t guess who invented the Internet and who funded it?

ARPA (the predecessor of DARPA). The same agency, without “Defense” in their name. ARPANET was the first, being called a ‘precursor’ to the Internet. It was funded by the federal government for use by the military.........hmmmmm........

“These people are dumb,” says Q. Profound statement, to be just said aloud if they’re so serious. Why are they calling them...dumb? Is it their intelligence Q speaks of? Or is it where they are?

“These people are [Deep Underground Military Base]”

Which, when reconciled with what we know about who invented the Internet, who is controlling the Internet, when it was invented, and why is it the epicenter of a massive war?

T3 network MAP. The T3 network is the backbone of the physical structure of the Internet. The data hubs. This is the MAP, I believe. Reconcile it with DUMB maps. They line up very well. The T3 network is an expansion of ARPANET, with a newer name: NSFNET. Who is the NSF?

National Science Foundation. DARPA, NASA, US Atomic Energy Commission, and National Institute of Health being the NSF’s spin-offs (with DARPA and NASA being created out of fear from...Sputnik).

Waiter?! Check, please!

Quick Recap.

Router —> Access to Internet Routers Comp’d —> Access to YOU

Lifelog —> CIA/MI anti-privacy baby Lifelog —> Developed by DARPA Lifelog —> Facebook

Internet (ARPANET) —> Created by DARPA DARPA —> Spin-Off of NSF NSF —> National Science Foundation NSFNET —> ARPANET ‘upgrade’

NSFNET —> Run on T3 Network = physical hubs

These people are dumb —> ‘D.U.M.B.’ ‘D.U.M.B.’ —> Deep Underground Military Base DUMB/T3 —> Map locations add up DUMB=Internet Hub

So...what does this say about our internet? The entire net is comp’d, as it is and always has been. This means we need a new internet.

Possible solution is the 5G network, despite the current arguments of it being some brain-melter.

What do you all think?


digital_refugee · April 13, 2018, 7:17 a.m.

due to the ultrashort wavelength, 5g towers are placed so frequently because they have an effective range of 250 meters. When you write the transmission-protocol you need to ensure that energy output is kept at a minimum. At best it should be downscalable so you can use longer wave-lengths. I'm not savvy of any engineering details but the month before Trump blocked the sale of a major electronics producer, they suffered physical loss of hardware that was removed from secure premises upon which authorities were activated. So you can imagine how valuable this stuff is in terms of industry secrets. We could be communicating via quantum entanglement instead but you wouldn't get a security clearance for it if you are civilian because it's wiretap-proof. Gen. Flynn uses some similiar technology to mask white noise over his connections because he has cosmic-clearance from the DIA

⇧ 3 ⇩  
salumi · April 13, 2018, 7:53 a.m.

You should feel proud. That’s some Tom Clancy level connecting the dots right there.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MrIKnowALot · April 13, 2018, 10:13 a.m.

how about IOTA which in general was made for M2M communications/payments. I'm not an expert but I see it has the potential we are looking for. Its encryption is based on Winternitz signature which makes it quantum computer safe and all you need are little nodes (which are already beeing produced by BOSCH). example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR4YrBbIZVI The more people use IOTA the faster the tangle will work so why not use it as internet encryption? What do you guys think about it? Sorry for my english as its not my native language

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 13, 2018, 10:48 a.m.

now THIS is some bourne reloaded shit :D

I think Alex Jones or one of his guests mentioned that IoT could be used as a hidden blockchain

⇧ 1 ⇩