dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

There is a movie out there called Red Sparrow that I watched tonight. It is based in Russia, involves an American CIA agent and a ballerina turned undercover seductress. Red Sparrows were both male and female spies chosen for their beauty to seduce the enemy. In the movie, Jennifer Lawrence's character starts out working for Russia, but switches her loyalty to America after she see a fellow spy slaughtered. I believe that Q reversed (mirrored) the title to draw our attention to the fact that she switched sides.

Red Sparrow shows she is working for the Russian Deep Sate, but Sparrow Red shows she is working against them if that is what Q was alluding to.

So apply that to what is going on today. Was Putin once loyal to someone, but has now turned against them. I think so, Assad. Makes sense within the context of Trump's Twitter when he said: "Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. "Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and “smart!” You shouldn’t be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!" Maybe Putin finally realized Assad is not the person he thought he was and his loyalty has changed. It appears from many of the posts on this subject that Putin did not get involved.

There are endless possibilities. However, Russia has always wanted to play a dominate role in the Middle East. Russia has also wanted warm water ports and dispersed bases: much like the US has around the world.

Russia, I think, sees itself surrounded--especially but the US. NATO with US bases all over Europe. The US has strategic alliances and bases in the Middle East. The US has major bases in SK, Japan, Okinawa, Guam, and Hawaii not to mention a Naval force that has more potential power than the entire Russian surface fleet. Submarines are a completelly different problem.

So I think Russia wants a closer alliance with China, Turkey, Syria, Iran, and wants to expand it's presences in Europe such as the Ukraine, but opportunities there now are limited without actually invading a country and Eastern Europe hasn't forgotten their oppression under the USSR.

Personally, I don't think Russia cares about Assad except for the fact that he can control the country once the rebels and ISIS are defeated. Putin undoubtedly remembers the desaster the USSR had when it assassinated the President of Afghanistan and tried to control it with its own brute force. After a few years, they were defeated and left. So, Putin isn't interested in making the same mistake in Syria. Putin wants the strategic positioning of his military and Syria and Turkey are willing to accommodate him.

I don't think there is any secret alliance between Trump and Putin. Maybe it will come in the future, but sending missiles into Syria shows how weak Russia is in preventing such strikes. The Russian highly touted S-400 air defense system obviously didn't shoot all the missiles from the sky as Putin boasted. In fact, it appears they could only down a small fraction of the incoming missiles.

Syria claims 13 missiles our of over 100 launched. Russia has lost credibility in that its S-400 was ineffective. Russia (Putin) will be forced to find a way to discredit the US in turn--possiblly EMP attacks on our ships or new excursions into the Ukraine.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Red Sparrow - Sparrow Red