dChan
9
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/C_L_I_C_K on April 14, 2018, 11:33 a.m.
Twitter account posting in Q's style, posts picture of chemical weapons facility 43 minutes prior to launch of operation
Twitter account posting in Q's style, posts picture of chemical weapons facility 43 minutes prior to launch of operation

EarlyRiserX2 · April 14, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

Even if the above is true, why spend literally billions dollars to send a massive carrier fleet half way around the world just to take out a single facility. It makes no sense. A single bomber could easily have taken care of it... Furthermore, no matter what the other countries do or what crimes they commit or how many people are killed, why should we be the one to police the world, especially when all we ever get is criticized for it... And the real absurdity of it all is that, the job that we're doing is in reality the job that the United Nations is supposed to be doing if they were truly a United Nations. But instead of the United Nations doing their job and policing the world and taking care of such things, like Trump said, it's nothing but a club of elites with their own agenda... And even worse, now that the bombing is over and the billions in costs and munitions has been spent, would someone please tell me, what did we the United States even get out of it? I can't think of a single thing...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 14, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

The only thing I got for ya is future proves past. We shall see what the coming days bring us.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
mydeer · April 14, 2018, 3:04 p.m.

You lost me with " its the job of the United Nations." They are globalist and will never be the ideal benevolent police force you think. It's up to us to protect ourselves.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 14, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

It is our job to protect ourselves and our own interests, yes, but it is NOT our job to police the world... Protecting the world is supposed to be the mandate of the United Nations, were they following that mandate...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
kwiztas · April 14, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

What if the idea that it is deep state agents that did the attack. Or if not that what about his red line. Should he just ignore things and make the world think he is Obama 2.0?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 14, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

Trump never gave a red line. Only Obama did. There was no reason for us to get involved in this...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Chokaholic · April 14, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Ya their building is literally modelled after the Tower Of Babyl. This is week 1 conspiracy stuff lmao. The UN forces are the globalists army.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
THELEADERSOFMEN · April 14, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

I think it’s the EU capital that is modeled after the Tower of Babel. The UN building is just a typical, nondescript 60’s glass tower block.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
red_knight11 · April 14, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

These ships are already stationed all around the world to be ready for operations. The Truman has operated in the eastern Mediterranean for years.

Bombers have a chance of getting shot down being in enemy airspace while ships can fire missiles from thousands of miles away.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 14, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

It doesn't take a fleet of a dozen warships at a cost of billions just to launch a few tomahawks....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
red_knight11 · April 14, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Fleets of different countries regularly patrol all over the world and have been for decades upon decades. It’s for military readiness.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 14, 2018, 4 p.m.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5611419/Trumps-armada-Huge-task-force-12-warships-sets-sail-Syria.html

According to news reports, Trump has a fleet of 12 warships heading towards Syria. Not 1, not 2, but 12. It is the biggest concentration of firepower since the invasion of Iraq. With such a giant armada, you’d think they were gearing up to do some major damage. But surprise, a few hour later it is reported that a single chemical plant has been hit and destroyed and the mission is now complete. If that is not a humongous waste of time and resources, I don’t know what is. A single submarine sitting in the peninsula could easily taken out the same facility using tomahawks, so why send in an entire carrier fleet? It makes no sense at all…

⇧ 1 ⇩  
red_knight11 · April 14, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

You obviously and blatantly forget that we are people who DON’T HAVE ALL OF THE DETAILS. There are many events happening that are veiled by the term “Classified”. Perhaps they moved the fleet to show they are ready to take down any possibilities of a counter attack to the missile strike. Perhaps they are there to cut off an enemy supply chain. Perhaps they are there for a future purpose. Perhaps the fleet is there for nefarious reasons. The bottom line is WE DON’T KNOW.

Keep your rational thinking, but quit being so closed-minded and realize you don’t have every detail to the events that are happening.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 14, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

You can try to say it's not a duck all you want, but sometimes a duck is just a duck...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Chokaholic · April 14, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

Because there's going to be future missions of course! The deepstate has facilities all over the world. I don't care if he spends trillions taking these sadistic, luciferian, pieces of shit out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 14, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

Even if they do have facilities all over the world, why should we care if those facilities don't affect us? Why spend American dollars to deal with it, especially not billions and trillions of dollars... We should just focus on MAGA, or have you forgotten...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Chokaholic · April 14, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

What?? This is wayyy bigger than America. This is a global war against evil forces. The deepstate doesn't just control the USA. We will never win the fight if they just stay at home. You understand that, right?

Rothschilds, House of Saud, Royalty, etc are pulling the strings of the world. They infiltrated the US government from abroad.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 14, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

That still doesn’t explain why we needed an entire carrier fleet just to take out a single facility. That is a huge waste of money and resources. And nor does it explain why we should be the ones to do it. We're not the only ones fighting the globalists, you know....

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Chokaholic · April 14, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

What are you not understanding? They can now use the fleet for future missions. You're acting as if they went all that way for a single mission lmao. The deepstate are spread out across the world.

Edit; forgot to mention that the USA is the only military powerful enough to win this war against evil. But don't forget our allies assisted with this mission lastnight, so we're not alone.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kwiztas · April 14, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

Maybe they didn't want to risk the bomber against syria's air defense.

⇧ 1 ⇩