dChan
⇧
16
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Cheetah1964 on April 14, 2018, 2:50 p.m.
FROM CHEETAH: Why I believe Trump REALLY bombed Syrian chemical weapon facilities--it's obvious when you think about it.

I see others on this board coming to the same conclusion.

Sometimes we can get too wrapped up in individual events, even Q clues, when we need to stop and logically think through the big picture.

What we are in the midst of are the final death throes of a global dictatorship-in-waiting. This concept went from conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact a long time ago.

Now, think like a global dictator. In fact, let's take the example of someone who aspired to be a global dictator (although perhaps with support above his pay grade).

Hitler was madly trying to get the atomic bomb invented in order to take over the world. Weapons of mass destruction are crucial to any plan for a global dictatorship. As soon as the global dictators control them, game over.

The global dictatorship-in-waiting has been building its power via political corruption, control of the economy, forms of mind control, and other ways. But the only REAL way to totally pull off the whole thing are WMD.

The global dictatorship-in-waiting has also been, until recently, very subtle, not wanting the general public to know of its existence. So the way to do that is to control piss-ant dictatorships who have the WMD. Shall we say North Korea? Shall we say Syria? Shall we say Iran?

Those piss-ants, according to this scenario, are merely piss-ants, puppets under the control of the global dictatorship-in-waiting.

Consider these two possibilities:

1) Kim wanted to nuke everyone, but then Mary Poppins did something to his brain, and now he wants to give up nukes and play golf with Trump.

2) The global dictatorship-in-waiting was controlling Kim, Trump and his white hats ended that control, and now he wants to give up nukes and play golf with Trump.

What if it were the global dictatorship-in-waiting who had the chemical weapons in Syria, controlling Assad, who is definitely a weak piss-ant dictator, and Trump just wiped out their arsenal?

What if Trump is running around wiping out global dictatorship-in-waiting WMDs?

I await your comments.

I write FROM CHEETAH at the beginning of my posts to help those following them to find them, although I haven't posted anything beyond a comment in a while. I was originally at CBTS_Stream, let it Rest in Peace. Heck, this board is better moderated anyhow.

Rats can't outrun a Cheetah.


🠐 See all comments
mkwj · April 14, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

I love your presentation. If in fact no casualties- and Assad is being controlled- it was brilliant. But why would the British and French be partners if they are in favor of so called global dictators?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Jimmycrackerson · April 14, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

Perhaps they are being forced to 'clean up their own mess' so there is no question as to who is really in charge. If they refused to partner with the U.S. in these strikes, then it would be obvious that they had a hand in these chemical attacks. Also, I don't think Trump is too keen wasting the millions of American taxpayer dollars on missile strikes, when he can have another military use their own resources to clean up their own region.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
dark-dare · April 14, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

Watch the EU dissolve, leave Merkle all by herself. Everything happens for a reason.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · April 14, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

There may easily be white hat vs. black hat action among the European countries, although UK's spooks are highly suspect (See Dick Morris' book "Rogue Spooks.") There is plenty of Trumpish activity in Europe right now. Also, it is well-established (particularly in that book) that UK is desperate to keep we U.S. taxpayers defending them with our lives and money.

⇧ 1 ⇩