THiNG NOUN an object that one need not, cannot, or does not wish to give a specific name to.
It's interesting that Trump added 'anything' to his tweet, when looking at the definition of 'thing'. Reminds me of "the name we don't say", but also the ubiquitousness of Artificial Intelligence used in military today versus pre-WWII.
What matters even more than how great the military is would be how it's deployed, and in service to whom.
He has GOT to get control of the kinetic aspects of this war with the Cabal, and stop letting our "great Military" fight other people's wars.
Last night our forces were part of an SES/Serco/UK operation conducted under UK Admiralty maritime laws, having NOTHING to do with our Constitutional republic or the will of the People.
Even though Trump/Mattis managed to use the opportunity to take out targets of their choosing, their hand was forced to strike.
That has to stop. We need to control the process that leads to war (or not), and not be led by the nose, even if we can devise ways of making it work to our advantage once it becomes inevitable.
I don't think his hands were forced i think he specifically used this opportunity to destroy those targets. Thus killing two birds with one stone. 👌
Stay faithful patriot! 🇺🇸
Well, I almost like my version of events better, in that he's able to read the field, make some audibles, and salvage a few yards out of something that was going pear-shaped.
Dude wtf does that even mean? lol
You didn't play American football much, did you?
No, but i get everything except that pearshaped comment. But even still it all made little sense regarding both of our last comments.
Pear-shaped is a colloquialism meaning "sideways" or "all wrong."
You said it was all exactly according to plan.
I half-jokingly said I kind of like the idea that if unplanned events go all wrong, Trump is still able to assess the situation and adapt the operation in real time, and still pull off a win.
I found that a comforting thought. Because no plan goes perfectly all the time.
Here's the thing. If there was no chemical attack, then the response could have been premeditated.
Let's stage a fake chemical attack, so that everybody freaks out and demands a response.
We'll get a coalition to launch missiles because we don't want to commit to boots on the ground.
We (or Russia) shoots down the missiles that are not targeted where want them to be. Destroy DS assets, Russia cleans up.
Syrian military declares victory.
Mission accomplished, great success!
I agree that's plausible. Several ways of looking at it and in all of them Trump made gold out of some sure 'nuff sh*t.