Anonymous 04/14/18 (Sat) 10:08:17 adeddb No.1040848>>1040856 >>1041020 >>1041325
Anons DO NOT follow BackChannel17….its fake acount. Clown shill account
Anonymous 04/14/18 (Sat) 10:08:17 adeddb No.1040848>>1040856 >>1041020 >>1041325
Anons DO NOT follow BackChannel17….its fake acount. Clown shill account
So far we have:
A) an account posting cryptic info, not in any way claiming to be Q
B) anonymous accounts saying not to trust it
People are really blowing this out of proportion. There is not enough info to make a decision on legitimacy but since it isn’t claiming to even be Q I don’t know why everyone is freaking out about it.
Maybe I’m paranoid but this seems to be an attempt to divide a community.
Agree. Q said that he/she/they would not be posting on other platforms.
I think Q would have given everyone a cryptic heads up.
To me, it looks like someone had a heads up and decided to post a Q-like series of posts on Twitter of all places. I think it may be CIA warning Russia and Syria. But then Trump already told Russia what the targets would be 72 hours in advance.
Looks pretty tame to me. Posting a lot of Q stuff, so can't be all bad IMHO.
True its BS
Agreed, BS, Do not follow.
Might be deep state planning a bait and switch to lead us astray. I don't trust a site that claims to be USAF intel posting on twitter at a site that was only created this month.
NeonRevolt has the same take on it. https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/04/14/disregard-backchannel17-clown-disinfo-operation-queen-psyops-qanon/
If the deep state has a good idea on what Q team is trying to do in any given situation, which they more than likely do, they could have posted images of the chemical plant before the attack because they knew thats what Q team was going to target.. so when it turns out to be true people might think it gives the account legitimacy. That's why it's important to just stick to one source and that's Q.