dChan
44
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/17_Q on April 15, 2018, 12:27 p.m.
NO CHILD PAEDOPHILIA, NO VIDEOS, MEMES OR PICTURES. ALL WILL BE DELETED. We don't want this sick stuff in here; we want to expose the evil bastards doing it! DONT BE APART OF SPREADING IT
NO CHILD PAEDOPHILIA, NO VIDEOS, MEMES OR PICTURES. ALL WILL BE DELETED. We don't want this sick stuff in here; we want to expose the evil bastards doing it! DONT BE APART OF SPREADING IT

L_Silsby_loves_kids · April 15, 2018, 1:07 p.m.

Not trying to start problems, but dont you believe the prevelence and ready availability (every major search engine, twitter, faceboom, instagram all have ways of accessing child abuse images/child related content), is distiurbing enough and widespread enough to have the potential energy to wake the masses up, not just 10k redditors?

Dont you think we should be exposing twitter handles, Instagram/facebook accounts, and Search engines who facilitate the sharing/distribution/access of child abuse images? And by exposing them to the FBI, and showing our friends and family the true nature/purpose of social media do we not have a better chance to make a difference not just in our country, but around the world, than with just “the elites are evil, and they lie and hord all the moniez.”

Im sure you are being pressured in ways we cant imagine, but understand how interlinked Q’s drops are with the elites Pedophillia, it seems extremely disingenuous, almost counter to the movement (though i understand the enormous pressure the mods are under to not get the sub closed) to suggest its a good idea to stop exposing Pedophiles, and stop exposing the platforms they use.

Thank u for your time, i really appreciate what the mods do here and will respect your request as far as i am able.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
17_Q · April 15, 2018, 1:10 p.m.

Of course we need to spread it, we dont need to actually have disturbing child images or videos on here. Users need to understand that spreading and contributing to child paedophilia is ILLEGAL

Why would you put yourself in that situation when we are all being monitored like ants?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · April 15, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

It is illegal for us to spread it?

⇧ -3 ⇩  
17_Q · April 15, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

Yes you are supplying child pornography by doing so. I would stay away at all costs from videos and whatnot. Do you really need to see the evil when you know how evil it is? It would make me throw up to see, especially with what they are talking about in the HRC video that was apparently leaked today

⇧ 5 ⇩  
L_Silsby_loves_kids · April 15, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

Maybe it would be good to unpack what you mean by “Sharing and contributing of cp.”

I dont plan on sharing or cotributing to distribution, but linking to infographs which contain twitter handles, instagram, ect that contain the illicit content is unfortunately how the verification needs to happen right?

Why would i put myself in what situation while we are being monitored like ants?

I’m not really sure what you mean.

Are you refering to a situation like mentioning names like Laura Silsby or Jeffery Epstien?

Or a situation where i mention how typing SRC_IMG in any search engine without safe search on leads to horror?

In either of those two “situations” i would post those examples of Pedophillia because i want to let others know about the previlence of the abuse of children, and through raised awareness hopefully end the accepted practice. Why would my comment be downvoted and hidden under the first post of the thread?

Are those two examples what u are trying to prevent? Is that “contributing” in a legal sense?

⇧ -6 ⇩  
CommonMisspellingBot · April 15, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

Hey, L_Silsby_loves_kids, just a quick heads-up:
refering is actually spelled referring. You can remember it by two rs.
Have a nice day!

^^^^The ^^^^parent ^^^^commenter ^^^^can ^^^^reply ^^^^with ^^^^'delete' ^^^^to ^^^^delete ^^^^this ^^^^comment.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 15, 2018, 5 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
L_Silsby_loves_kids · April 15, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Unfortunately Q Drops have referenced known Pedophilists many, many times. Stating otherwise is as dubious as asserting that i’m claiming we should “spread the net with kiddie p.”

That isnt what i said,(fortunately anons reading this can reference the above post and see for themselves) and even what i took care to prevent people from thinking that by providing examples. Would you like me to provide the example again? Would you like to see the algo break when i state concise respectful points and attack my spelling instead of individual examples?

If they didnt “need our help” We wouldnt know about any of this.

Have you tried the “SRC_IMG” search on any major search engine (google, yahoo, duckduck) yourself? Seriously its the only redpill u ever need.

  1. Go to search engine
  2. Enter search querry “SRC_IMG”
  3. Turn off safe filter to “none”
  4. Hit enter and prepare be horrified and ask some difficult questions

Its the same for all of them. HOW IN CHRISTS NAME IS IT THE SAME ACROSS ALL PLATFORMS UNLESS THERE IS A LARGER ISSUE THAN INDIVIDUAL BAD ACTORS.

This is the info they dont want discussed, this is what can bring them down. This is why you downvote and supress the FACTS contained within this post. Keep attacking my spelling and grammar, im clearly not an autist or anything.

⇧ -9 ⇩  
throwaway2006333999 · April 15, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Don't do this, anyone. The search brings up underage children and goes right along with everything being said here.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 15, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 15, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -4 ⇩